219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15337215)
1. Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Malm S; Frigstad S; Sagberg E; Larsson H; Skjaerpe T
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 44(5):1030-5. PubMed ID: 15337215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Real-time simultaneous triplane contrast echocardiography gives rapid, accurate, and reproducible assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Malm S; Frigstad S; Sagberg E; Steen PA; Skjarpe T
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 Dec; 19(12):1494-501. PubMed ID: 17138035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Choosing apical long-axis instead of two-chamber view gives more accurate biplane echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Malm S; Sagberg E; Larsson H; Skjaerpe T
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2005 Oct; 18(10):1044-50. PubMed ID: 16198881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurements using contrast echocardiography: The influence of the left ventricular length measurements in a large cohort of patients during monitoring cardiotoxic effects of chemotherapy.
Suwatanaviroj T; He W; Mirhadi E; Paakanen R; Pituskin E; Paterson I; Choy J; Becher H
Echocardiography; 2018 Mar; 35(3):322-328. PubMed ID: 29272561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of contrast agent-enhanced versus non-contrast agent-enhanced real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for analysis of left ventricular systolic function.
Krenning BJ; Kirschbaum SW; Soliman OI; Nemes A; van Geuns RJ; Vletter WB; Veltman CE; Ten Cate FJ; Roelandt JR; Geleijnse ML
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Nov; 100(9):1485-9. PubMed ID: 17950813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of left ventricular volumes and function: a multicenter comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, cine ventriculography, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiography.
Hoffmann R; Barletta G; von Bardeleben S; Vanoverschelde JL; Kasprzak J; Greis C; Becher H
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Mar; 27(3):292-301. PubMed ID: 24440110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Paraplane analysis from precordial three-dimensional echocardiographic data sets for rapid and accurate quantification of left ventricular volume and function: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Nosir YF; Stoker J; Kasprzak JD; Lequin MH; Dall'Agata A; Ten Cate FJ; Roelandt JR
Am Heart J; 1999 Jan; 137(1):134-43. PubMed ID: 9878946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard.
Greupner J; Zimmermann E; Grohmann A; Dübel HP; Althoff TF; Borges AC; Rutsch W; Schlattmann P; Hamm B; Dewey M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(21):1897-907. PubMed ID: 22595410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic value of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced echocardiography for left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurement in patients with poor acoustic windows: a comparison of echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Saloux E; Labombarda F; Pellissier A; Anthune B; Dugué AE; Provost N; Allain P; De Craene M; Milliez P; Manrique A
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Oct; 27(10):1029-40. PubMed ID: 25063466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of left ventricular volumes with echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: real-life evaluation of standard versus new semiautomatic methods.
Aurich M; André F; Keller M; Greiner S; Hess A; Buss SJ; Katus HA; Mereles D
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Oct; 27(10):1017-24. PubMed ID: 25129394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast echocardiography improves interobserver agreement for wall motion score index and correlation with ejection fraction.
Galema TW; van de Ven AR; Soliman OI; van Domburg RT; Vletter WB; van Dalen BM; Nemes A; ten Cate FJ; Geleijnse ML
Echocardiography; 2011 May; 28(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 21535116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast echocardiography improves the accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular remodeling measurements: a prospective, randomly assigned, blinded study.
Thomson HL; Basmadjian AJ; Rainbird AJ; Razavi M; Avierinos JF; Pellikka PA; Bailey KR; Breen JF; Enriquez-Sarano M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Sep; 38(3):867-75. PubMed ID: 11527647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved semiautomated quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using 3-dimensional echocardiography with a full matrix-array transducer: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Caiani EG; Corsi C; Zamorano J; Sugeng L; MacEneaney P; Weinert L; Battani R; Gutiérrez-Chico JL; Koch R; Perez de Isla L; Mor-Avi V; Lang RM
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2005 Aug; 18(8):779-88. PubMed ID: 16084328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lack of agreement between left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction determined by two-dimensional echocardiography and contrast cineangiography in postinfarction patients.
Bernard Y; Meneveau N; Boucher S; Magnin D; Anguenot T; Schiele F; Vuillemenot A; Bassand JP
Echocardiography; 2001 Feb; 18(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 11262534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measurements of functional single ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction (from the Pediatric Heart Network Fontan Cross-Sectional Study).
Margossian R; Schwartz ML; Prakash A; Wruck L; Colan SD; Atz AM; Bradley TJ; Fogel MA; Hurwitz LM; Marcus E; Powell AJ; Printz BF; Puchalski MD; Rychik J; Shirali G; Williams R; Yoo SJ; Geva T;
Am J Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 104(3):419-28. PubMed ID: 19616678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The apical long-axis rather than the two-chamber view should be used in combination with the four-chamber view for accurate assessment of left ventricular volumes and function.
Nosir YF; Vletter WB; Boersma E; Frowijn R; Ten Cate FJ; Fioretti PM; Roelandt JR
Eur Heart J; 1997 Jul; 18(7):1175-85. PubMed ID: 9243153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid full volume data acquisition by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular indexes in children: a validation study compared with magnetic resonance imaging.
Bu L; Munns S; Zhang H; Disterhoft M; Dixon M; Stolpen A; Sonka M; Scholz TD; Mahoney LT; Ge S
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2005 Apr; 18(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 15846155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using freehand transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Mannaerts HF; Van Der Heide JA; Kamp O; Papavassiliu T; Marcus JT; Beek A; Van Rossum AC; Twisk J; Visser CA
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2003 Feb; 16(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 12574735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Administration of an intravenous perfluorocarbon contrast agent improves echocardiographic determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging.
Hundley WG; Kizilbash AM; Afridi I; Franco F; Peshock RM; Grayburn PA
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Nov; 32(5):1426-32. PubMed ID: 9809958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitation of left ventricular function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance.
Soliman OI; Kirschbaum SW; van Dalen BM; van der Zwaan HB; Mahdavian Delavary B; Vletter WB; van Geuns RJ; Ten Cate FJ; Geleijnse ML
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 102(6):778-83. PubMed ID: 18774006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
