31 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15337355)
1. A variance decomposition approach to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of the Johnson and Ettinger model.
Moradi A; Tootkaboni M; Pennell KG
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Feb; 65(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 25947051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An intelligent interval forecasting system based on fuzzy time series and error distribution characteristics for air quality index.
Yang H; Gao Y; Zhao F; Wang J
Environ Res; 2024 Jun; 251(Pt 1):118577. PubMed ID: 38432567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An information-based approach to handle various types of uncertainty in fuzzy bodies of evidence.
Sarabi-Jamab A; Araabi BN
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227495. PubMed ID: 31929579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating Uncertainty in White Matter Tractography Using Wild Non-local Bootstrap.
Yap PT; An H; Chen Y; Shen D
Comput Diffus MRI Brain Connect (2013); 2014; 2014():139-148. PubMed ID: 34308434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling of variability and uncertainty in human health risk assessment.
Dutta P
MethodsX; 2017; 4():76-85. PubMed ID: 28239562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comprehensive studies of hydrogeochemical processes and quality status of groundwater with tools of cluster, grouping analysis, and fuzzy set method using GIS platform: a case study of Dalcheon in Ulsan City, Korea.
Venkatramanan S; Chung SY; Rajesh R; Lee SY; Ramkumar T; Prasanna MV
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Aug; 22(15):11209-23. PubMed ID: 25779109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uncertainty characterization approaches for risk assessment of DBPs in drinking water: a review.
Chowdhury S; Champagne P; McLellan PJ
J Environ Manage; 2009 Apr; 90(5):1680-91. PubMed ID: 19167150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of fuzzy logic techniques for the qualitative interpretation of preferences in a collective questionnaire for users of wheelchairs.
Lafuente R; Page A; Sánchez-Lacuesta J; Tortosa L
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jan; 35(1):91-107. PubMed ID: 9505257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fuzzy-stochastic characterization of site uncertainty and variability in groundwater flow and contaminant transport through a heterogeneous aquifer.
Zhang K; Li H; Achari G
J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):73-82. PubMed ID: 19217686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A combined Monte Carlo and possibilistic approach to uncertainty propagation in event tree analysis.
Baraldi P; Zio E
Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1309-26. PubMed ID: 18631304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a fuzzy-stochastic nonlinear model to incorporate aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty.
Li H; Zhang K
J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Jan; 111(1-4):1-12. PubMed ID: 19945767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Demonstration of a mobile Flux Laboratory for the Atmospheric Measurement of Emissions (FLAME) to assess emissions inventories.
Moore TO; Doughty DC; Marr LC
J Environ Monit; 2009 Feb; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 19212582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Joint propagation of variability and imprecision in assessing the risk of groundwater contamination.
Baudrit C; Guyonnet D; Dubois D
J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):72-84. PubMed ID: 17321003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Different methodologies to quantify uncertainties of air emissions.
Romano D; Bernetti A; De Lauretis R
Environ Int; 2004 Oct; 30(8):1099-107. PubMed ID: 15337355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
