These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15337429)

  • 1. Mammography: will adequate manpower exist?
    D'Orsi CJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 42(5):975-8, viii. PubMed ID: 15337429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Declining screening mammography rates: a multigenerational loss of opportunity?
    Carlos RC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):388-9. PubMed ID: 19155399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Workforce shortages in breast imaging: impact on mammography utilization.
    Wing P; Langelier MH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 19155396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current realities of delivering mammography services in the community: do challenges with staffing and scheduling exist?
    D'Orsi C; Tu SP; Nakano C; Carney PA; Abraham LA; Taplin SH; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR; Berns E; Barlow WE; Elmore JG
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 15798153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The more eyes, the better to see? From double to quadruple reading of screening mammograms.
    Elmore JG; Brenner RJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1141-3. PubMed ID: 17652275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast imaging: current utilization, trends, and implications.
    Bassett LW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):612-3. PubMed ID: 17715107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality control in mammography. Everyone has a role. American College of Radiology.
    Haus A
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Nov; 11(11):123, 125-6, 129-30. PubMed ID: 10123210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lay screeners in mammographic survey programs.
    Dowdy AH; Lagasse LD; Roach P; Wilson D
    Radiology; 1970 Jun; 95(3):619-21. PubMed ID: 5442669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A blurry picture. Mammography, though marred by controversy, is still the most valued tool for detecting breast cancer. But a continuing shortage of radiologists takes some luster off the gold standard.
    Becker C
    Mod Healthc; 2002 Dec; 32(48):28-33. PubMed ID: 12510629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Professional and economic factors affecting access to mammography: a crisis today, or tomorrow? Results from a national survey.
    Farria DM; Schmidt ME; Monsees BS; Smith RA; Hildebolt C; Yoffie R; Monticciolo DL; Feig SA; Bassett LW
    Cancer; 2005 Aug; 104(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 15973693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The current state of the diagnostics of breast diseases in Lombardy].
    Vergnaghi D; Panizza P; Gozzi G
    Radiol Med; 2000 Nov; 100(5):314-20. PubMed ID: 11213407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.
    Ringash J;
    CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 11233866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiology--a case study in technology and manpower (second of two parts).
    Knowles JH
    N Engl J Med; 1969 Jun; 280(24):1323-9. PubMed ID: 5771779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms.
    Bassett LW; Hollatz-Brown AJ; Bastani R; Pearce JG; Hirji K; Chen L
    Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):189-92. PubMed ID: 7997550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Stomper PC; Gelman RS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancer detection rate: designing imaging trials to demonstrate improvements.
    Jiang Y; Miglioretti DL; Metz CE; Schmidt RA
    Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):360-7. PubMed ID: 17456866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The politics of mammography.
    McLelland R; Pisano ED
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 1732930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.
    Sickles EA; Wolverton DE; Dee KE
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):861-9. PubMed ID: 12202726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening mammography: increasing the effort toward breast cancer detection.
    Hamwi DA
    Nurse Pract; 1990 Dec; 15(12):27, 30-2. PubMed ID: 2284059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.