These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15337429)

  • 21. Why question screening mammography for women in their forties?
    Fletcher SW
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1259-71. PubMed ID: 7480669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mammography and the training program of the American College of Radiology.
    Scott WG
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1967 Apr; 99(4):1002-8. PubMed ID: 6067246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Trends in breast cancer screening in Missouri from 1987 to 1995, and predictions for the years 2000 and 2010.
    Sarr M; Simoes EJ; Murayi T; Figgs LT; Brownson RC
    Mo Med; 1998 Dec; 95(12):663-9. PubMed ID: 9863343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.
    Elmore JG; Taplin SH; Barlow WE; Cutter GR; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE; Abraham LA; Fosse JS; Carney PA
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 15987961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Meeting the mammography screening needs of underserved women: the performance of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in 2002-2003 (United States).
    Tangka FK; Dalaker J; Chattopadhyay SK; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Hall IJ; DeGroff A; Blackman DK; Coates RJ
    Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Nov; 17(9):1145-54. PubMed ID: 17006720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Regulating radiology: ethical issues in mammography and federal legislation.
    Schonfeld Fey T
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2000 Dec; 9(10):1113-8. PubMed ID: 11153107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A portrait of breast imaging specialists and of the interpretation of mammography in the United States.
    Lewis RS; Sunshine JH; Bhargavan M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):W456-68. PubMed ID: 17056875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The training of nonphysician personnel for use in a mammography program.
    Alcorn FS; O'Donnell E
    Cancer; 1969 Apr; 23(4):879-83. PubMed ID: 5775979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The control of breast cancer through mammography screening. What is the evidence?
    Tabár L; Dean PB
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):993-1005. PubMed ID: 3306777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. 1991 staffing concerns survey.
    Nielsen GA
    Radiol Manage; 1991; 13(3):45-58. PubMed ID: 10112684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
    White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Should women with implants or a history of treatment for breast cancer be excluded from mammography screening programs?
    Kopans DB; Moore RH; McCarthy KA; Hall DA; Hulka CA; Whitman GJ; Slanetz PJ; Halpern EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 168(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 8976914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Managed care organizations and mammography: opportunities to serve underserved women.
    Reid WM; Marshburn J; Siddharthan K
    Women Health; 1999; 28(4):13-28. PubMed ID: 10378343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The clinical breast exam: opportunities for R.T.s.
    Legg JS
    Radiol Technol; 2002; 74(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 12462960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Status of mammography after the Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial: digital versus film.
    Dershaw DD
    Breast J; 2006; 12(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 16509833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. NIH Consensus Statement. Breast cancer screening for women ages 40-49.
    NIH Consens Statement; 1997 Jan 21-23; 15(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 9267441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Routine screening mammography in women older than 74 years: a review of the available data.
    Galit W; Green MS; Lital KB
    Maturitas; 2007 Jun; 57(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 17336004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Critical and comparative evaluation of the radiographic method and the photofluorographic method in mass mammographic examinations].
    Cappellini M; De Giuli G
    Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Apr; 23(8):357-61. PubMed ID: 5568866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.