214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15337871)
1. Is three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction justified before endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?
Sprouse LR; Meier GH; Parent FN; DeMasi RJ; Stokes GK; LeSar CJ; Marcinczyk MJ; Mendoza B
J Vasc Surg; 2004 Sep; 40(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 15337871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel method to estimate iliac tortuosity in evaluating EVAR access.
Kristmundsson T; Sonesson B; Resch T
J Endovasc Ther; 2012 Apr; 19(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 22545879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative planning for endovascular aortic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: feasibility of nonenhanced MR angiography versus contrast-enhanced CT angiography.
Goshima S; Kanematsu M; Kondo H; Kawada H; Kojima T; Sakurai K; Watanabe H; Shimabukuro K; Matsuno Y; Ishida N; Takemura H; Bae KT
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):948-55. PubMed ID: 23392427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional CT angiography in analysis of anatomical suitability for stentgraft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Pitoulias GA; Donas KP; Schulte S; Aslanidou EA; Papadimitriou DK
Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 21498369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography.
Parker MV; O'Donnell SD; Chang AS; Johnson CA; Gillespie DL; Goff JM; Rasmussen TE; Rich NM
J Vasc Surg; 2005 Feb; 41(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 15767998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of aortoiliac tortuosity on endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: evaluation of 3D computer-based assessment.
Wolf YG; Tillich M; Lee WA; Rubin GD; Fogarty TJ; Zarins CK
J Vasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 34(4):594-9. PubMed ID: 11668310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT artifacts of the proximal aortic neck: an important problem in endograft planning.
Kritpracha B; Wolfe J; Beebe HG
J Endovasc Ther; 2002 Feb; 9(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 11958313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective intraindividual comparison of unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the planning of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Saida T; Mori K; Sato F; Shindo M; Takahashi H; Takahashi N; Sakakibara Y; Minami M
J Vasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 55(3):679-87. PubMed ID: 22104342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is ultrasound more accurate than axial computed tomography for determination of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter?
Sprouse LR; Meier GH; Parent FN; DeMasi RJ; Glickman MH; Barber GA
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Jul; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 15177228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of computed tomography angiography reconstruction software on anatomic measurements and endograft component selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Corriere MA; Islam A; Craven TE; Conlee TD; Hurie JB; Edwards MS
J Vasc Surg; 2014 May; 59(5):1224-31.e1-3. PubMed ID: 24439321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endovascular repair of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a paradigm shift?
Welborn MB; Yau FS; Modrall JG; Lopez JA; Floyd S; Valentine RJ; Clagett GP
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2005; 39(5):381-91. PubMed ID: 16193210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of interpretation of CT-angiography in patients with a suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.
Hoornweg LL; Wisselink W; Vahl AC; Reekers JA; van Delden OM; Legemate DA; Balm R
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Mar; 35(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 17988903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maximum diameter measurements of aortic aneurysms on axial CT images after endovascular aneurysm repair: sufficient for follow-up?
Baumueller S; Nguyen TD; Goetti RP; Lachat M; Seifert B; Pfammatter T; Frauenfelder T
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Dec; 34(6):1182-9. PubMed ID: 20945067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-dimensional multiplanar and three-dimensional volume-rendered vascular CT in pancreatic carcinoma: interobserver agreement and comparison with standard helical techniques.
Baek SY; Sheafor DH; Keogan MT; DeLong DM; Nelson RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jun; 176(6):1467-73. PubMed ID: 11373215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of DynaCT in the morphological assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm for endovascular repair.
Nordon IM; Hinchliffe RJ; Malkawi AH; Taylor J; Holt PJ; Morgan R; Loftus IM; Thompson MM
J Endovasc Ther; 2010 Apr; 17(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 20426634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of dynamic computed tomography to evaluate pre- and postoperative aortic changes in AAA patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair.
Teutelink A; Muhs BE; Vincken KL; Bartels LW; Cornelissen SA; van Herwaarden JA; Prokop M; Moll FL; Verhagen HJ
J Endovasc Ther; 2007 Feb; 14(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 17291151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomic characteristics of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on conventional CT scans: Implications for rupture risk.
Fillinger MF; Racusin J; Baker RK; Cronenwett JL; Teutelink A; Schermerhorn ML; Zwolak RM; Powell RJ; Walsh DB; Rzucidlo EM
J Vasc Surg; 2004 Jun; 39(6):1243-52. PubMed ID: 15192565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can preoperative spiral CT scans alone determine the feasibility of endovascular AAA repair? A comparison to angiographic measurements.
Shin CK; Rodino W; Kirwin JD; Wisselink W; Abruzzo FM; Panetta TF
J Endovasc Ther; 2000 Jun; 7(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 10883953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of 64-row computed tomography abdominal aortic aneurysm neck measurements.
Diehm N; Kickuth R; Gahl B; Do DD; Schmidli J; Rattunde H; Baumgartner I; Dick F
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Feb; 45(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 17264000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sixty-four-detector CT angiography of infrarenal aortic neck length and angulation: prospective analysis of interobserver variability.
Diehm N; Katzen BT; Samuels S; Pena C; Powell A; Dick F
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Sep; 19(9):1283-8. PubMed ID: 18725090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
