BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15337975)

  • 1. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
    Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
    Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Significance-prevalence index number: a reinterpretation and enhancement of data from the North American contact dermatitis group.
    Maouad M; Fleischer AB; Sherertz EF; Feldman SR
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1999 Oct; 41(4):573-6. PubMed ID: 10495378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens.
    Saripalli YV; Achen F; Belsito DV
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2003 Jul; 49(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12833010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of Finn Chambers and T.R.U.E. test methodologies in detecting the relevant allergens inducing contact dermatitis.
    Suneja T; Belsito DV
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Dec; 45(6):836-9. PubMed ID: 11712026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epidemiological survey of contact dermatitis in Italy (1984-1993) by GIRDCA (Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali).
    Sertoli A; Francalanci S; Acciai MC; Gola M
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Mar; 10(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 10072334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital.
    Albert MR; González S; González E
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9810020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patch-test results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006.
    Zug KA; Warshaw EM; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Belsito DL; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Mathias CG; Deleo VA; Rietschel RL; Marks J
    Dermatitis; 2009; 20(3):149-60. PubMed ID: 19470301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000.
    Marks JG; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS;
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2003 Jun; 14(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 14749021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period.
    Pratt MD; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug K
    Dermatitis; 2004 Dec; 15(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 15842061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitizations to allergens of TRUE test in 864 consecutive eczema patients in Israel.
    Magen E; Mishal J; Schlesinger M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 55(6):370-1. PubMed ID: 17101019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000.
    Wetter DA; Davis MD; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; Connolly SM; el-Azhary RA; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Sep; 53(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 16112346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
    Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997.
    Albert MR; Chang Y; González E
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 10594298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epicutaneous patch test results in children and adults with allergic contact dermatitis in Karlovac county: a retrospective survey.
    Kuljanac I; Knežević E; Cvitanović H
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2011; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 21703155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
    Lazarov A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis*.
    Machovcova A; Dastychova E; Kostalova D; Vojtechovska A; Reslova J; Smejkalova D; Vaneckova J; Vocilkova A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Sep; 53(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 16128756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Postmarketing survey results of T.R.U.E. TEST, a new allergen patch test.
    Prue C; Martinson ME; McAnally PM; Stagner WC
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 9471992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
    Soni BP; Sherertz EF
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contact sensitivity in patients with leg ulcerations: a North American study.
    Saap L; Fahim S; Arsenault E; Pratt M; Pierscianowski T; Falanga V; Pedvis-Leftick A
    Arch Dermatol; 2004 Oct; 140(10):1241-6. PubMed ID: 15492187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 57.