These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15338460)

  • 1. No bias in linkage analysis.
    Abecasis G; Cox N; Daly MJ; Kruglyak L; Laird N; Markianos K; Patterson N
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):722-3; author reply 723-7. PubMed ID: 15338460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No "bias" toward the null hypothesis in most conventional multipoint nonparametric linkage analyses.
    Mukhopadhyay I; Feingold E; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):716-8; author reply 723-7. PubMed ID: 15338457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conventional multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis is not necessarily inherently biased.
    Visscher PM; Wray NR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):718-20; author reply 723-7. PubMed ID: 15338458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Bias toward the null" means reduced power.
    Sieberts SK; Broman KW; Gudbjartsson DF
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):720-2; author reply 723-7. PubMed ID: 15338459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A likelihood approach for quantitative-trait-locus mapping with selected pedigrees.
    Wang K
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 16011693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative trait locus mapping using human pedigrees.
    Blangero J; Williams JT; Almasy L
    Hum Biol; 2000 Feb; 72(1):35-62. PubMed ID: 10721613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lod scores for gene mapping in the presence of marker map uncertainty.
    Stringham HM; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 21(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11443732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study comparing precision of the maximum multipoint heterogeneity LOD statistic to three model-free multipoint linkage methods.
    Finch SJ; Chen CH; Gordon D; Mendell NR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):315-25. PubMed ID: 11754467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HLODs remain powerful tools for detection of linkage in the presence of genetic heterogeneity.
    Hodge SE; Vieland VJ; Greenberg DA
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):556-9. PubMed ID: 11791217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics.
    Greenberg DA; Abreu PC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):299-314. PubMed ID: 11754466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large upward bias in estimation of locus-specific effects from genomewide scans.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD; Blangero J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Dec; 69(6):1357-69. PubMed ID: 11593451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distribution and magnitude of type I error of model-based multipoint lod scores: implications for multipoint mod scores.
    Xing C; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 30(5):447-58. PubMed ID: 16685712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Statistical approaches to gene mapping of human diseases].
    Sun HX; Fang FD
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Feb; 23(1):86-8, 96. PubMed ID: 12905828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. All LODs are not created equal.
    Nyholt DR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Aug; 67(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 10884360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Down-weighting of multiple affected sib pairs leads to biased likelihood-ratio tests, under the assumption of no linkage.
    Greenwood CM; Bull SB
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Apr; 64(4):1248-52. PubMed ID: 10090918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linkage and association.
    Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(6):565-76. PubMed ID: 9811419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ascertainment bias in linkage analysis: comments on Ginsburg et al.
    Vieland VJ; Hodge SE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 28(3):283-5; author reply 286-7. PubMed ID: 15578735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Significance thresholds for quantitative trait locus mapping under selective genotyping.
    Manichaikul A; Palmer AA; Sen S; Broman KW
    Genetics; 2007 Nov; 177(3):1963-6. PubMed ID: 17720902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gene mapping in the 20th and 21st centuries: statistical methods, data analysis, and experimental design.
    Terwilliger JD; Göring HH
    Hum Biol; 2000 Feb; 72(1):63-132. PubMed ID: 10721614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linkage and association to genetic markers.
    Elston RC
    Exp Clin Immunogenet; 1995; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 8534500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.