These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15339299)
1. Predicting and correcting bias caused by measurement error in line transect sampling using multiplicative error models. Marques TA Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 15339299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the response rate in the presence of measurement error. Qu Y; Kulkarni PM; Sanger TM Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):197-211. PubMed ID: 16526011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unbiased estimation of relative reproductive success of different groups: evaluation and correction of bias caused by parentage assignment errors. Araki H; Blouin MS Mol Ecol; 2005 Nov; 14(13):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16262861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement error in a random walk model with applications to population dynamics. Staudenmayer J; Buonaccorsi JP Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1178-89. PubMed ID: 17156293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A model-based approach for making ecological inference from distance sampling data. Johnson DS; Laake JL; Ver Hoef JM Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):310-8. PubMed ID: 19459840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlated errors in biased surrogates: study designs and methods for measurement error correction. Spiegelman D; Zhao B; Kim J Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(11):1657-82. PubMed ID: 15736283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accelerated failure time models with covariates subject to measurement error. He W; Yi GY; Xiong J Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(26):4817-32. PubMed ID: 17436310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology. Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Wellmann J; Gerken M; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3261-78. PubMed ID: 12375303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using hidden Markov models to deal with availability bias on line transect surveys. Borchers DL; Zucchini W; Heide-Jørgensen MP; Cañadas A; Langrock R Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):703-13. PubMed ID: 23848543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bias in slope estimates for the linear errors in variables model by the variance ratio method. Edland SD Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 8934594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fully parametric and semi-parametric regression models for common events with covariate measurement error in main study/validation study designs. Spiegelman D; Casella M Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):395-409. PubMed ID: 9192443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perpendicular distance models for line transect sampling. Buckland ST Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):177-95. PubMed ID: 4005374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multivariate method for measurement error correction using pairs of concentration biomarkers. Fraser GE; Yan R Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 17140813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correction for covariate measurement error in generalized linear models--a bootstrap approach. Haukka JK Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):1127-32. PubMed ID: 7548695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A detailed evaluation of adjustment methods for multiplicative measurement error in linear regression with applications in occupational epidemiology. Lyles RH; Kupper LL Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1008-25. PubMed ID: 9290228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative analysis of variability and uncertainty with known measurement error: methodology and case study. Zheng J; Frey HC Risk Anal; 2005 Jun; 25(3):663-75. PubMed ID: 16022698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robust estimating functions and bias correction for longitudinal data analysis. Wang YG; Lin X; Zhu M Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):684-91. PubMed ID: 16135019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The number needed to treat (NNT) can be adjusted for bias when the outcome is measured with error. Marschner IC; Emberson J; Irwig L; Walter SD J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1244-52. PubMed ID: 15617950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proportional hazards model with covariates subject to measurement error. Nakamura T Biometrics; 1992 Sep; 48(3):829-38. PubMed ID: 1420844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating and testing interactions in linear regression models when explanatory variables are subject to classical measurement error. Murad H; Freedman LS Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4293-310. PubMed ID: 17340676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]