These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15339899)

  • 21. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Breast tumours].
    Coutant C; Bremaud N; Barranger E
    Rev Prat; 2008 Feb; 58(4):413-23. PubMed ID: 18506984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Better prognosis and favorable tumor stages in patients with invasive breast mammary carcinoma after introduction of the mass screening of breast cancer in Tilburg, the Netherlands].
    Groenendijk RP; Bult P; Wobbes T
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 May; 148(19):961; author reply 961-2. PubMed ID: 15160564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recurrence-free survival in patients with small breast cancer. An analysis of cancers 10 mm or less detected clinically and by screening.
    Arnesson LG; Smeds S; Fagerberg G
    Eur J Surg; 1994 May; 160(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 8075195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of mammography screening attendance and detection mode in predicting breast cancer survival-is there added prognostic value?
    Biesheuvel C; Czene K; Orgeás CC; Hall P
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 21470933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors influencing prognosis in carcinoma of breast.
    Chitania KM
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1973 Aug; 61(4):178-81. PubMed ID: 4774795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Effectiveness of breast cancer screening].
    Ohnuki K; Ohuchi N
    Nihon Rinsho; 2000 Apr; 58 Suppl():483-8. PubMed ID: 11026038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Results of mammographic screening at the Mammary Center of Debrecen in 1999 and 2000].
    Simon E; Péter M; Benkó K; Horkay E; Erdélyi G; Péter M; Szúcs-Farkas Z; Tóth J; Kovács I; Fülöp B
    Orv Hetil; 2002 Apr; 143(14):721-3. PubMed ID: 11975392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Socioeconomic inequalities in attending the mass screening for breast cancer in the south of the Netherlands--associations with stage at diagnosis and survival.
    Aarts MJ; Voogd AC; Duijm LE; Coebergh JW; Louwman WJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Jul; 128(2):517-25. PubMed ID: 21290176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening women at intermediate risk: harm or charm?
    Panizza P; Viganò S; Bonelli L; Bazzocchi M; Belli P; Calabrese M; Caramella D; Corcione S; Del Maschio A; Martincich L; Montemezzi S; Pediconi F; Petrillo A; Sardanelli F; Bruzzi P
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S116-7. PubMed ID: 23083554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [After-care in breast carcinoma. Medical examination and mammography compared].
    Wandt H
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2000 Aug; 142(35):20-1. PubMed ID: 11006698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Effectiveness and monitoring of breast cancer screening programs].
    Paci E; Day NE
    Epidemiol Prev; 1995 Dec; 19(65):310-7. PubMed ID: 8852080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival.
    Porter GJ; Evans AJ; Cornford EJ; Burrell HC; James JJ; Lee AH; Chakrabarti J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):676-83. PubMed ID: 17312053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Prognosis of mammary carcinoma].
    Bartel M; Göring G; Endmann P; Oberthür K
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1972 Aug; 66(15):767-71. PubMed ID: 5086493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Mammography screening. Breast cancer mortality reduction by one fourth].
    Kreutzkamp B
    Med Monatsschr Pharm; 2005 Sep; 28(9):330-1. PubMed ID: 16163889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Mass mammography screening. A means of reducing mortality in breast cancer?].
    Bauer M; Schulz-Wendtland R; von Fournier D
    Radiologe; 1988 Mar; 28(3):95-102. PubMed ID: 3287445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimal breast cancer: a surgeon's dilemma.
    Galante M
    Cancer; 1971 Dec; 28(6):1561-8. PubMed ID: 5127803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bilateral carcinoma of the breast.
    Shellito JG; Bartlett WC
    Arch Surg; 1967 Apr; 94(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 6021145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do tumors detected by mammography screening have a favorable prognosis?
    O'Regan RM
    JAMA; 2004 Sep; 292(9):1062-3. PubMed ID: 15339899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.