BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15340974)

  • 1. Influence of object spatial location and task complexity on children's use of their preferred hand depending on their handedness consistency.
    Leconte P; Fagard J
    Dev Psychobiol; 2004 Sep; 45(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 15340974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which factors affect hand selection in children's grasping in hemispace? Combined effects of task demand and motor dominance.
    Leconte P; Fagard J
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Feb; 60(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 16288823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influences of task complexity, object location, and object type on hand selection in reaching in left and right-handed children and adults.
    Bryden PJ; Mayer M; Roy EA
    Dev Psychobiol; 2011 Jan; 53(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 20812232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sinistrals' upper hand: evidence for handedness differences in the representation of body space.
    Hach S; Schütz-Bosbach S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):408-18. PubMed ID: 20056306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of skill demands and object position on the distribution of preferred hand reaches.
    Mamolo CM; Roy EA; Bryden PJ; Rohr LE
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):349-51. PubMed ID: 15177810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Under what conditions will right-handers use their left hand? The effects of object orientation, object location, arm position, and task complexity in preferential reaching.
    Bryden PJ; Huszczynski J
    Laterality; 2011 Nov; 16(6):722-36. PubMed ID: 21391107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children.
    Bryden PJ; Roy EA
    Dev Psychobiol; 2006 Mar; 48(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 16489592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Functional asymmetry in children's manipulation (author's transl)].
    Yasumaru H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1981 Aug; 52(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 7328930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateral preferences in children with intellectual deficiency of idiopathic origin.
    Leconte P; Fagard J
    Dev Psychobiol; 2006 Sep; 48(6):492-500. PubMed ID: 16886190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of target location, task complexity, and gender on children's use of their preferred foot.
    Dahmen R; Fagard J; Ghamgui S
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Sep; 241(9):2241-2247. PubMed ID: 37537307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial representation of predictive motor learning.
    Witney AG; Wolpert DM
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Apr; 89(4):1837-43. PubMed ID: 12686568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Midline crossing: developmental trend from 3 to 10 years of age in a preferential card-reaching task.
    Carlier M; Doyen AL; Lamard C
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Aug; 61(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 16513237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamics of manual skill: a computerized analysis of single peg movements and stochastic resonance hypothesis of cerebral laterality.
    Elalmis DD; Tan U
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 118(3):399-432. PubMed ID: 18300013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Manual asymmetries in bimanual reaching: the influence of spatial compatibility and visuospatial attention.
    Neely K; Binsted G; Heath M
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Feb; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 15629221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A performance measure of the degree of hand preference.
    Bryden PJ; Pryde KM; Roy EA
    Brain Cogn; 2000 Dec; 44(3):402-14. PubMed ID: 11104533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choosing sides: lateralization in line trisection and quadrisection as a function of reading direction and handedness.
    Zivotofsky AZ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jul; 20(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 15183392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human side preferences in three different whole-body movement tasks.
    Mohr C; Brugger P; Bracha HS; Landis T; Viaud-Delmon I
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 May; 151(1-2):321-6. PubMed ID: 15084448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amplification and diffusion of manual preference from lateralized practice in children.
    Teixeira LA; da Silva RP; de Freitas SL
    Dev Psychobiol; 2010 Dec; 52(8):723-30. PubMed ID: 21117242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task complexity relates to activation of cortical motor areas during uni- and bimanual performance: a functional NIRS study.
    Holper L; Biallas M; Wolf M
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(4):1105-13. PubMed ID: 19306929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hand preference in simultaneous unimanual tasks: a preliminary examination.
    Bryden PJ; Kay CA
    Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):284-7. PubMed ID: 12030453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.