These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15342220)

  • 21. Characteristics of pupil responses during far-to-near and near-to-far accommodation.
    Kasthurirangan S; Glasser A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):328-39. PubMed ID: 15953118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Target spatial frequency determines the response to conflicting defocus- and convergence-driven accommodative stimuli.
    Okada Y; Ukai K; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B; Iijima A; Bando T
    Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(4):475-84. PubMed ID: 16198392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus.
    Day M; Strang NC; Seidel D; Gray LS; Mallen EA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 16390487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A study of the Stiles-Crawford (S-C) function at 35 degrees in the temporal field and the stability of the foveal S-C function peak over time.
    Bedell HE; Enoch JM
    J Opt Soc Am; 1979 Mar; 69(3):435-42. PubMed ID: 458510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Depth-of-focus of the human eye in the near retinal periphery.
    Wang B; Ciuffreda KJ
    Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(11):1115-25. PubMed ID: 15050815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Steady state of accommodation during observation of a Scheiner image.
    Jiang BC
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Oct; 65(10):809-13. PubMed ID: 3207152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vergence accommodation and monocular closed loop blur accommodation have similar dynamic characteristics.
    Suryakumar R; Meyers JP; Irving EL; Bobier WR
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 17187839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shift in the peak of the photopic Stiles-Crawford function with marked accomodation.
    Blank K; Provine RR; Enoch JM
    Vision Res; 1975 Apr; 15(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 1129997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of altering spherical aberration on the static accommodative response.
    Theagarayan B; Radhakrishnan H; Allen PM; Calver RI; Rae SM; O'Leary DJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jan; 29(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 19154282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The accommodative pupil responses of children and young adults at low and intermediate levels of ambient illumination.
    Gislén A; Gustafsson J; Kröger RH
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(8):989-93. PubMed ID: 18316106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of amplitude and starting point on accommodative dynamics in humans.
    Kasthurirangan S; Glasser A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Sep; 46(9):3463-72. PubMed ID: 16123453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accommodation-related changes in monochromatic aberrations of the human eye as a function of age.
    López-Gil N; Fernández-Sánchez V; Legras R; Montés-Micó R; Lara F; Nguyen-Khoa JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Apr; 49(4):1736-43. PubMed ID: 18385098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accommodation during static retinal imaging with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
    Kelly JP; Seibel EJ
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1205-11. PubMed ID: 17544780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of retinal image degradation on pre-attentive visual search (PAVS) efficiency for flicker, movement and orientation stimuli.
    Davison P; Loughman J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 16918769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of apparent depth in pictorial images on accommodation.
    Busby A; Ciuffreda KJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 15953117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Age-related changes in static accommodation and accommodative miosis.
    Radhakrishnan H; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jul; 27(4):342-52. PubMed ID: 17584285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A dual-mode dynamic model of the human accommodation system.
    Khosroyani M; Hung GK
    Bull Math Biol; 2002 Mar; 64(2):285-99. PubMed ID: 11926118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contributions of foveal and non-foveal retina to the human eye's focusing response.
    Labhishetty V; Cholewiak SA; Banks MS
    J Vis; 2019 Oct; 19(12):18. PubMed ID: 31627211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of foveal distractors on saccadic eye movements: a dead zone for the global effect.
    Vitu F; Lancelin D; Jean A; Farioli F
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(28):4684-708. PubMed ID: 17049960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stimulus requirements for the decoding of myopic and hyperopic defocus under single and competing defocus conditions in the chicken.
    Diether S; Wildsoet CF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2242-52. PubMed ID: 15980207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.