BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

637 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15343248)

  • 1. Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: how safe?
    Seeds JW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 191(2):607-15. PubMed ID: 15343248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk factors for procedure-related fetal losses after mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis.
    Kong CW; Leung TN; Leung TY; Chan LW; Sahota DS; Fung TY; Lau TK
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Oct; 26(10):925-30. PubMed ID: 16838383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revisiting the fetal loss rate after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis: a single center's 16-year experience.
    Odibo AO; Gray DL; Dicke JM; Stamilio DM; Macones GA; Crane JP
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 111(3):589-95. PubMed ID: 18310360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pregnancy outcome following second-trimester amniocentesis: a case-control study.
    Müngen E; Tütüncü L; Muhcu M; Yergök YZ
    Am J Perinatol; 2006 Jan; 23(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 16450269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual risk of fetal loss following routine second trimester amniocentesis: a controlled study of 20,460 cases.
    Kozlowski P; Knippel A; Stressig R
    Ultraschall Med; 2008 Apr; 29(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 17602371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Eddleman KA; Malone FD; Sullivan L; Dukes K; Berkowitz RL; Kharbutli Y; Porter TF; Luthy DA; Comstock CH; Saade GR; Klugman S; Dugoff L; Craigo SD; Timor-Tritsch IE; Carr SR; Wolfe HM; D'Alton ME
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 17077226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new guidance system for freehand, obstetric ultrasound-guided procedures.
    Paltieli Y; Degani S; Zrayek A; Gonen R; Lewinski MR; Zamberg Y; Ohel G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 11896949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amniocentesis before the 15th gestational week in single and twin gestations-complications and quality of genetic analysis.
    Jörgensen C; Andolf E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Feb; 77(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 9512317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pregnancy loss rate after mid-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies.
    Cahill AG; Macones GA; Stamilio DM; Dicke JM; Crane JP; Odibo AO
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):257.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19136086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transplacental needle passage in early amniocentesis and pregnancy loss.
    Bravo RR; Shulman LP; Phillips OP; Grevengood C; Martens PR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Sep; 86(3):437-40. PubMed ID: 7651657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Second-trimester amniocentesis vs. chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis in multiple gestations.
    Antsaklis A; Souka AP; Daskalakis G; Kavalakis Y; Michalas S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 20(5):476-81. PubMed ID: 12423485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Outcome of pregnancy following amniocentesis in the prenatal diagnosis of genetic birth defects].
    Schlensker KH; Citoler P; Bolte A
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1984 Mar; 44(3):137-45. PubMed ID: 6562979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal loss rate after second trimester amniocentesis at different gestational age.
    Saltvedt S; Almström H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Jan; 78(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9926885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amniocentesis in twin pregnancies.
    Supadilokluck S; Tongprasert F; Tongsong T; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Srisupundit K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Aug; 280(2):207-9. PubMed ID: 19112573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic amniocentesis: gestation-specific pregnancy outcome and comparison of outcome following early and traditional amniocentesis.
    Roper EC; Konje JC; De Chazal RC; Duckett DP; Oppenheimer CA; Taylor DJ
    Prenat Diagn; 1999 Sep; 19(9):803-7. PubMed ID: 10521835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mid-trimester amniocentesis and antibiotic prophylaxis.
    Gramellini D; Fieni S; Casilla G; Raboni S; Nardelli GB
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Oct; 27(10):956-9. PubMed ID: 17607664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prenatal diagnosis in twin gestations: a comparison between second-trimester amniocentesis and first-trimester chorionic villus sampling.
    Wapner RJ; Johnson A; Davis G; Urban A; Morgan P; Jackson L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jul; 82(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 8515925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between 20G and 22G needle for second trimester amniocentesis in terms of technical aspects and short-term complications.
    Athanasiadis AP; Pantazis K; Goulis DG; Chatzigeorgiou K; Vaitsi V; Assimakopoulos E; Tzevelekis F; Tsalikis T; Bontis JN
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Aug; 29(8):761-5. PubMed ID: 19412914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is pregnancy loss after amniocentesis related to the volume of amniotic fluid obtained?
    Cebesoy FB; Balat O; Pehlivan S; Kutlar I; Dikensoy E; Ugur MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Mar; 279(3):357-60. PubMed ID: 18665378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-operator comparison of early and mid-second-trimester amniocentesis.
    Assel BG; Lewis SM; Dickerman LH; Park VM; Jassani MN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 79(6):940-4. PubMed ID: 1579318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.