These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1534354)

  • 21. Scrambled eyes? Disrupting scene structure impedes focal processing and increases bottom-up guidance.
    Foulsham T; Alan R; Kingstone A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2008-25. PubMed ID: 21647804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Disrupted object-scene semantics boost scene recall but diminish object recall in drawings from memory.
    Bainbridge WA; Kwok WY; Baker CI
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Nov; 49(8):1568-1582. PubMed ID: 34031795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):396-411. PubMed ID: 15910127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does object view influence the scene consistency effect?
    Sastyin G; Niimi R; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):856-66. PubMed ID: 25522833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Has someone moved my plate? The immediate and persistent effects of object location changes on gaze allocation during natural scene viewing.
    Võ ML; Zwickel J; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1251-5. PubMed ID: 20601706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Global transsaccadic change blindness during scene perception.
    Henderson JM; Hollingworth A
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):493-7. PubMed ID: 12930482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attention to smoking-related and incongruous objects during scene viewing.
    Bonitz VS; Gordon RD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Oct; 129(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 18804752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selective attention during scene perception: evidence from negative priming.
    Gordon RD
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Oct; 34(7):1484-94. PubMed ID: 17263073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.
    Võ ML; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gist in time: Scene semantics and structure enhance recall of searched objects.
    Josephs EL; Draschkow D; Wolfe JM; Võ ML
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():100-108. PubMed ID: 27270227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition.
    Hayward WG; Tarr MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Oct; 23(5):1511-21. PubMed ID: 9411023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of foveal priming and extrafoveal preview on object identification.
    Henderson JM; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 Aug; 13(3):449-63. PubMed ID: 2958593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of scene and object orientation on the scene consistency effect.
    Lauer T; Willenbockel V; Maffongelli L; Võ ML
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 Sep; 394():112812. PubMed ID: 32682913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition.
    Morrison CM; Ellis AW; Quinlan PT
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 1435273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speed limits: orientation and semantic context interactions constrain natural scene discrimination dynamics.
    Rieger JW; Köchy N; Schalk F; Grüschow M; Heinze HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):56-76. PubMed ID: 18248140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does scene context always facilitate retrieval of visual object representations?
    Nakashima R; Yokosawa K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Apr; 18(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 21327383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Are age-of-acquisition effects on object naming due simply to differences in object recognition? Comments on levelt (2002).
    Bonin P; Chalard M; Méot A; Barry C
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1172-82. PubMed ID: 17128615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of scene context on object recognition is independent of attentional focus.
    Munneke J; Brentari V; Peelen MV
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():552. PubMed ID: 23970878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Object-intrinsic oddities draw early saccades.
    Becker MW; Pashler H; Lubin J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 17311476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of working memory in analogical mapping.
    Waltz JA; Lau A; Grewal SK; Holyoak KJ
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1205-12. PubMed ID: 11126942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.