These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15344586)

  • 1. Identification and correction of common impression concerns: protocol and considerations.
    Kurtzman GM; Strassler HE
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 16(5):377-82; quiz 384. PubMed ID: 15344586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques.
    Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 48(2):vi-vii, 445-70. PubMed ID: 15172610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of defects in surface detail for monophase, 2-phase, and 3-phase impression techniques: an in vitro study.
    Varvara G; Murmura G; Sinjari B; Cardelli P; Caputi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 25438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simplified impression technique for dental implants.
    Vogel RE
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Mar; 23(3 Suppl 1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11913312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automixing: a new concept in elastomeric impression material delivery systems.
    Keck SC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):479-83. PubMed ID: 3900344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of stone dies produced by different impression materials. A comparative study of impression techniques.
    Wiktorsson G; Feder D
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 6348989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Universal paradigms for predictable final impressions.
    Vakay RT; Kois JC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Mar; 26(3):199-200, 202-6; quiz 208-9. PubMed ID: 15813574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A; Soderholm KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Building the edentulous impression--a layering technique using multiple viscosities of impression material.
    Massad J; Lobel W; Garcia LT; Monarres A; Hammesfahr PD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2006 Aug; 27(8):446-51; quiz 452, 468. PubMed ID: 16955716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trends in indirect dentistry: 5. Impression materials and techniques.
    Stewardson DA
    Dent Update; 2005 Sep; 32(7):374-6, 379-80, 382-4 passim. PubMed ID: 16178282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of mixing methods on mechanical properties of alginate impression materials.
    Frey G; Lu H; Powers J
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 16359477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impression materials: a comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry.
    Rubel BS
    Dent Clin North Am; 2007 Jul; 51(3):629-42, vi. PubMed ID: 17586147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptation of finger-smoothed irreversible hydrocolloid to impression surfaces.
    Lim PF; Neo KH; Sitoh L; Yeo KL; Stokes A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7575961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proper loading of impression tray minimizes inaccuracies.
    Beaumont AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):108. PubMed ID: 12239488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material to correct a defect in complete denture definitive impressions.
    Oh WS; Park JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):255-6. PubMed ID: 25444280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical considerations on self-curing resin materials for making trays and base plates (1). Flow and dimensional stability].
    Mizokami T; Nanami T; Hayashi H; Ishizuka I; Nishi K; Sekimachi N; Sugawara F; Ohi S; Sakashita K
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1983 Aug; 83(8):1137-43. PubMed ID: 6364368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of interchanging automatic mixing tips on void formation for an automixed addition silicone impression.
    Chong YH; Soh G; Lim KC
    Am J Dent; 1991 Jun; 4(3):127-9. PubMed ID: 1863433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.