These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15344586)

  • 21. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
    Mishra S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Impression materials].
    Antonopoulos AN
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1984; 38(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 6443401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictable elastomeric impressions in advanced fixed prosthodontics: a comprehensive review.
    Lee EA
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 19(9):529-36; quiz 537, 565. PubMed ID: 18038717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modified fluid wax impression for a severely resorbed edentulous mandibular ridge.
    Tan KM; Singer MT; Masri R; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):279-82. PubMed ID: 19328281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Significance and practical methods of immediate treatment of impressions in fixed prosthetics by the practitioner].
    Bugugnani R
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1983 Mar; (141):55-65. PubMed ID: 6349284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Viscoelastic properties of setting elastomeric impression materials.
    de Araujo PA; Jorgensen KD; Finger W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Nov; 54(5):633-6. PubMed ID: 3903132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
    Fernandez MA; Paez de Mendoza CY; Platt JA; Levon JA; Hovijitra ST; Nimmo A
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Making a great impression.
    Mechanic E
    Dent Today; 2010 Dec; 29(12):88, 90-1. PubMed ID: 21229926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impression techniques: clinical properties that matter.
    Nash RW
    Dent Today; 2014 Apr; 33(4):110, 112-3. PubMed ID: 24791295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material in removable prosthodontics. Part 1: edentulous impressions.
    Massad JJ; Cagna DR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Aug; 28(8):452-9; quiz 460, 470. PubMed ID: 18578103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hydraulic implant abutment level impressions.
    Hoos JC; Kaplowitz GJ
    Tex Dent J; 2003 Sep; 120(9):888-9. PubMed ID: 14560463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Materials science study on work for the further development of Stafanat-impression materials].
    Bruhn L; Curth K; Schneider L
    Zahntechnik (Berl); 1984 Mar; 25(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 6591659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin.
    Rutkunas V; Ignatovic J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 24445030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.