These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15344794)

  • 21. Emerging contaminants and treatment options in water recycling for indirect potable use.
    Wintgens T; Salehi F; Hochstrat R; Melin T
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 18192746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neurotoxic and hepatotoxic cyanotoxins removal by nanofiltration.
    Teixeira MR; Rosa MJ
    Water Res; 2006 Aug; 40(15):2837-46. PubMed ID: 16839584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. New process for alleviation of membrane fouling of modified hybrid MBR system for advanced domestic wastewater treatment.
    Shuo L; Baozhen W; Hongjun H; Yanping L
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(10):2059-66. PubMed ID: 19039188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identification of nanofiltration membrane foulants.
    Her N; Amy G; Plottu-Pecheux A; Yoon Y
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3936-47. PubMed ID: 17572472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of nanoparticles in polymeric and ceramic membrane structures: review of manufacturing procedures and performance improvement for water treatment.
    Kim J; Van der Bruggen B
    Environ Pollut; 2010 Jul; 158(7):2335-49. PubMed ID: 20430495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
    Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing the effluent organic matter removal of direct NF and powdered activated carbon/NF as high quality pretreatment options for artificial groundwater recharge.
    Kazner C; Wintgens T; Melin T; Baghoth S; Sharma S; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(6):821-7. PubMed ID: 18413940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Membrane bio-reactors for decentralized wastewater treatment and reuse.
    Meuler S; Paris S; Hackner T
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(2):285-94. PubMed ID: 18701776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Chemisorption of estrone in nylon microfiltration membranes: Adsorption mechanism and potential use for estrone removal from water.
    Han J; Qiu W; Hu J; Gao W
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(3):873-81. PubMed ID: 22189293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Endocrine disrupters in the aquatic environment: the Austrian approach--ARCEM.
    Bursch W; Fuerhacker M; Gemeiner M; Grillitsch B; Jungbauer A; Kreuzinger N; Moestl E; Scharf S; Schmid E; Skutan S; Walter I
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 15497860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Greywater recycling systems in Germany--results, experiences and guidelines.
    Nolde E
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(10):203-10. PubMed ID: 16104423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for the purification of cork processing wastewater.
    Benítez FJ; Acero JL; Leal AI; González M
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Mar; 162(2-3):1438-45. PubMed ID: 18650003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds and endocrine disrupting compounds by clean and fouled nanofiltration membranes.
    Yangali-Quintanilla V; Sadmani A; McConville M; Kennedy M; Amy G
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2349-62. PubMed ID: 19303127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rejection of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) by low pressure reverse osmosis membranes.
    Ozaki H; Ikejima N; Shimizu Y; Fukami K; Taniguchi S; Takanami R; Giri RR; Matsui S
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18653939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Priority organic micropollutants in water sources in Flanders and the Netherlands and assessment of removal possibilities with nanofiltration.
    Verliefde A; Cornelissen E; Amy G; Van der Bruggen B; van Dijk H
    Environ Pollut; 2007 Mar; 146(1):281-9. PubMed ID: 16965844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dichloroaniline retention by nanofiltration membranes.
    Causserand C; Aimar P; Cravedi JP; Singlande E
    Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(8):1594-600. PubMed ID: 15878032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Membrane fouling and selectivity mechanisms in effluent ultrafiltration coupled with flocculation.
    Soffer Y; Ben Aim R; Adin A
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):123-34. PubMed ID: 16003970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Risk assessment for organic trace compounds in wastewater: comparison of conventional and advanced treatment.
    Schwätter F; Hannich CB; Nöthe T; Oehlmann J; Fahlenkamp H
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(5):9-13. PubMed ID: 17881832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Problems of operation and main reasons for failure of membranes in tertiary treatment systems.
    Lazarova V; Gallego S; García Molina V; Rougé P
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1777-84. PubMed ID: 18547930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The negative rejection of H+ in NF of carbonate solution and its influences on membrane performance.
    Zhu A; Long F; Wang X; Zhu W; Ma J
    Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(8):1558-65. PubMed ID: 17250866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.