230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15344797)
21. Effects of wastewater effluent organic materials on fouling in ultrafiltration.
Kim HC; Dempsey BA
Water Res; 2008 Jul; 42(13):3379-84. PubMed ID: 18534655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Advanced treatment of membrane bioreactor (MBR) effluents for effective wastewater reclamation.
Sarp S; Chon K; Kim IS; Cho J
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 21252435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An integrated wastewater reuse concept combining natural reclamation techniques, membrane filtration and metal oxide adsorption.
Sperlich A; Zheng X; Ernst M; Jekel M
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(6):909-14. PubMed ID: 18413952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Autopsy of high-pressure membranes to compare effectiveness of MF and UF pretreatment in water reclamation.
Kim J; DiGiano FA; Reardon RD
Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 17961627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the behaviour of selected micropollutants in a membrane bioreactor and a conventional wastewater treatment plant.
Clara M; Strenn B; Ausserleitner M; Kreuzinger N
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):29-36. PubMed ID: 15497826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Can treated municipal wastewater be reused after ozonation and nanofiltration? Results from a pilot study of pharmaceutical removal in Henriksdal WWTP, Sweden.
Flyborg L; Björlenius B; Persson KM
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(5):1113-20. PubMed ID: 20220232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Development of an integrated membrane process for water reclamation.
Lew CH; Hu JY; Song LF; Lee LY; Ong SL; Ng WJ; Seah H
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):455-63. PubMed ID: 16004008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The removal of disinfection by-product precursors from water with ceramic membranes.
Harman BI; Koseoglu H; Yigit NO; Sayilgan E; Beyhan M; Kitis M
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(3):547-55. PubMed ID: 20706002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Membrane-flocculation-adsorption hybrid system in wastewater treatment: micro and nano size organic matter removal .
Vigneswaran S; Shon HK; Boonthanon S; Ngo HH; Aim RB
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):265-71. PubMed ID: 15686030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of natural organic matter and cations on the rejection of endocrine disrupting and pharmaceutically active compounds by nanofiltration.
Comerton AM; Andrews RC; Bagley DM
Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):613-22. PubMed ID: 19046596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rejection of pharmaceuticals by forward osmosis membranes.
Jin X; Shan J; Wang C; Wei J; Tang CY
J Hazard Mater; 2012 Aug; 227-228():55-61. PubMed ID: 22640821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM).
Lee N; Amy G; Croué JP; Buisson H
Water Res; 2004 Dec; 38(20):4511-23. PubMed ID: 15556226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Nutrient removal by NF and RO membranes in a decentralized sanitation system.
van Voorthuizen EM; Zwijnenburg A; Wessling M
Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(15):3657-67. PubMed ID: 16054670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Analysis of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and removal using a membrane bioreactor.
Radjenovic J; Petrovic M; Barceló D
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2007 Feb; 387(4):1365-77. PubMed ID: 17115140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Membrane bio-reactors for decentralized wastewater treatment and reuse.
Meuler S; Paris S; Hackner T
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(2):285-94. PubMed ID: 18701776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Treatment of hospital wastewater effluent by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis.
Beier S; Köster S; Veltmann K; Schröder H; Pinnekamp J
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(7):1691-8. PubMed ID: 20371926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Part I. Identifying anthropogenic markers in surface waters influenced by treated effluents: a tool in potable water reuse.
Sirivedhin T; Gray KA
Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(6):1154-64. PubMed ID: 15766970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Retention of pesticide Endosulfan by nanofiltration: influence of organic matter-pesticide complexation and solute-membrane interactions.
De Munari A; Semiao AJ; Antizar-Ladislao B
Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3484-96. PubMed ID: 23615337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing microfiltration-reverse osmosis and soil-aquifer treatment for indirect potable reuse of water.
Drewes JE; Reinhard M; Fox P
Water Res; 2003 Sep; 37(15):3612-21. PubMed ID: 12867327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of tertiary treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for water reuse in denim textile industry.
Ben Amar N; Kechaou N; Palmeri J; Deratani A; Sghaier A
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 19497667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
