These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15345371)

  • 1. Assessment of prediction confidence and domain extrapolation of two structure-activity relationship models for predicting estrogen receptor binding activity.
    Tong W; Xie Q; Hong H; Shi L; Fang H; Perkins R
    Environ Health Perspect; 2004 Aug; 112(12):1249-54. PubMed ID: 15345371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and Validation of Decision Forest Model for Estrogen Receptor Binding Prediction of Chemicals Using Large Data Sets.
    Ng HW; Doughty SW; Luo H; Ye H; Ge W; Tong W; Hong H
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2015 Dec; 28(12):2343-51. PubMed ID: 26524122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for prediction of estrogen receptor binding affinity of structurally diverse chemicals.
    Schmieder PK; Ankley G; Mekenyan O; Walker JD; Bradbury S
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1844-54. PubMed ID: 12924583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of (consensus) kNN QSAR for predicting estrogenic activity in a large diverse set of organic compounds.
    Asikainen AH; Ruuskanen J; Tuppurainen KA
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15113066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conformal Prediction Classification of a Large Data Set of Environmental Chemicals from ToxCast and Tox21 Estrogen Receptor Assays.
    Norinder U; Boyer S
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2016 Jun; 29(6):1003-10. PubMed ID: 27152554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. QSAR modeling for predicting mutagenic toxicity of diverse chemicals for regulatory purposes.
    Basant N; Gupta S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jun; 24(16):14430-14444. PubMed ID: 28435990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binary classification of a large collection of environmental chemicals from estrogen receptor assays by quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning methods.
    Zang Q; Rotroff DM; Judson RS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3244-61. PubMed ID: 24279462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. QSAR prediction of estrogen activity for a large set of diverse chemicals under the guidance of OECD principles.
    Liu H; Papa E; Gramatica P
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2006 Nov; 19(11):1540-8. PubMed ID: 17112243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consensus kNN QSAR: a versatile method for predicting the estrogenic activity of organic compounds in silico. A comparative study with five estrogen receptors and a large, diverse set of ligands.
    Asikainen AH; Ruuskanen J; Tuppurainen KA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Dec; 38(24):6724-9. PubMed ID: 15669333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In silico screening of estrogen-like chemicals based on different nonlinear classification models.
    Liu H; Papa E; Walker JD; Gramatica P
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jul; 26(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 17293141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The importance of molecular structures, endpoints' values, and predictivity parameters in QSAR research: QSAR analysis of a series of estrogen receptor binders.
    Li J; Gramatica P
    Mol Divers; 2010 Nov; 14(4):687-96. PubMed ID: 19921452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of estrogen receptor binding for 58,000 chemicals using an integrated system of a tree-based model with structural alerts.
    Hong H; Tong W; Fang H; Shi L; Xie Q; Wu J; Perkins R; Walker JD; Branham W; Sheehan DM
    Environ Health Perspect; 2002 Jan; 110(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 11781162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling.
    Mansouri K; Judson RS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():361-81. PubMed ID: 27311474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection.
    Tetko IV; Sushko I; Pandey AK; Zhu H; Tropsha A; Papa E; Oberg T; Todeschini R; Fourches D; Varnek A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1733-46. PubMed ID: 18729318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multispecies QSAR modeling for predicting the aquatic toxicity of diverse organic chemicals for regulatory toxicology.
    Singh KP; Gupta S; Kumar A; Mohan D
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2014 May; 27(5):741-53. PubMed ID: 24738471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative QSAR study using CoMFA, HQSAR, and FRED/SKEYS paradigms for estrogen receptor binding affinities of structurally diverse compounds.
    Waller CL
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):758-65. PubMed ID: 15032558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the QSAR's predictive truthfulness of the novel N-tuple discrete derivative indices on benchmark datasets.
    Martínez-Santiago O; Marrero-Ponce Y; Vivas-Reyes R; Rivera-Borroto OM; Hurtado E; Treto-Suarez MA; Ramos Y; Vergara-Murillo F; Orozco-Ugarriza ME; Martínez-López Y
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 May; 28(5):367-389. PubMed ID: 28590848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binary classification models for endocrine disrupter effects mediated through the estrogen receptor.
    Roncaglioni A; Piclin N; Pintore M; Benfenati E
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(7-8):697-733. PubMed ID: 19061085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ecotoxicological QSAR modeling of organic compounds against fish: Application of fragment based descriptors in feature analysis.
    Khan K; Baderna D; Cappelli C; Toma C; Lombardo A; Roy K; Benfenati E
    Aquat Toxicol; 2019 Jul; 212():162-174. PubMed ID: 31128417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.