These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15346259)
1. [Ultrasound follow-up of palpable solid, probably benign breast lesions (BI-RADS category III)]. Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjäger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R Rofo; 2004 Sep; 176(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 15346259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred? Park YM; Kim EK; Lee JH; Ryu JH; Han SS; Choi SJ; Lee SJ; Yoon HK Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1104-11. PubMed ID: 18855166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of malignancy in palpable solid breast masses considered probably benign or low suspicion: implications for management. Giess CS; Smeglin LZ; Meyer JE; Ritner JA; Birdwell RL J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1943-9. PubMed ID: 23197547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study. Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions. Dobrosavljević A; Rakić S; Nikoli B; Raznatović SJ; Dikić SD; Milosević Z; Jurisić A; Skrobić M Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histologic work-up of non-palpable breast lesions classified as probably benign at initial mammography and/or ultrasound (BI-RADS category 3). Gruber R; Jaromi S; Rudas M; Pfarl G; Riedl CC; Flöry D; Graf O; Sickles EA; Helbich TH Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 22429299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shear-wave elastography and greyscale assessment of palpable probably benign masses: is biopsy always required? Giannotti E; Vinnicombe S; Thomson K; McLean D; Purdie C; Jordan L; Evans A Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150865. PubMed ID: 27007593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses. Chan CH; Coopey SB; Freer PE; Hughes KS Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 26341750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Second reading of breast imaging at the hospital department of radiology: reasonable or waste of money?]. Teifke A; Vomweg TW; Hlawatsch A; Nasresfahani A; Kern A; Victor A; Schmidt M; Bittinger F; Düber C Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 16508842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of solid palpable masses assessed as BI-RADS 3 or 4A: a retrospective review. Patterson SK; Neal CH; Jeffries DO; Joe A; Klein K; Bailey J; Pinsky R; Paramagul C; Watcharotone K Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep; 147(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 25151294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities. Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound. Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification in 51 excised palpable pediatric breast masses. Koning JL; Davenport KP; Poole PS; Kruk PG; Grabowski JE J Pediatr Surg; 2015 Oct; 50(10):1746-50. PubMed ID: 25783351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management--follow-up and outcome. Raza S; Chikarmane SA; Neilsen SS; Zorn LM; Birdwell RL Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):773-81. PubMed ID: 18647850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probably Benign Solid Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Need for Biopsy Reassessed. Fatima K; Masroor I; Khanani S Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Dec; 19(12):3467-3471. PubMed ID: 30583671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Graf O; Helbich TH; Hopf G; Graf C; Sickles EA Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 17581897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women. Harvey JA; Nicholson BT; Lorusso AP; Cohen MA; Bovbjerg VE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1723-30. PubMed ID: 19933671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS. Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography. Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]