These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15346259)

  • 21. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
    Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions.
    Varas X; Leborgne JH; Leborgne F; Mezzera J; Jaumandreu S; Leborgne F
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):691-5. PubMed ID: 12185047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Probably benign breast lesions on ultrasonography: a retrospective review of ultrasonographic features and clinical factors affecting the BI-RADS categorization.
    Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kwak JY; Kim EK
    Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 20350247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
    Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
    Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
    Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Probably benign breast masses diagnosed by sonography: is there a difference in the cancer rate according to palpability?
    Shin JH; Han BK; Ko EY; Choe YH; Nam SJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):W187-91. PubMed ID: 19304679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patient compliance and diagnostic yield of 18-month unilateral follow-up in surveillance of probably benign mammographic lesions.
    Chung CS; Giess CS; Gombos EC; Frost EP; Yeh ED; Raza S; Birdwell RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Apr; 202(4):922-7. PubMed ID: 24660725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. First ultrasound diagnosis of BI-RADS 3 lesions in young patients: Can 6-months follow-up be sufficient to assess stability?
    Marcon M; Frauenfelder T; Becker AS; Dedes KJ; Boss A
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():226-233. PubMed ID: 28267544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic value of palpation, mammography, and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of fibroadenoma: impact of breast density, patient age, ultrasonographic size, and palpability.
    Zimmermann N; Ohlinger R
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E151-E157. PubMed ID: 21667430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sonographic features of histopathologically benign solid breast lesions that have been classified as BI-RADS 4 on sonography.
    Taskin F; Koseoglu K; Ozbas S; Erkus M; Karaman C
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2012 Jun; 40(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 22508447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bi-RADS category 3 nonpalpable breast masses on sonography: long-term results of a prospective cohort study.
    Alimoglu E; Alimoglu MK; Ceken K; Kabaalioglu A; Apaydin A; Cassano E; Sindel T
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2012; 40(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 22362168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Solid breast lesions: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
    Gordon PB; Goldenberg SL; Chan NH
    Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):573-80. PubMed ID: 8210392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography.
    Vizcaíno I; Gadea L; Andreo L; Salas D; Ruiz-Perales F; Cuevas D; Herranz C; Bueno F;
    Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):475-83. PubMed ID: 11323475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.
    Barr RG; Zhang Z; Cormack JB; Mendelson EB; Berg WA
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):701-12. PubMed ID: 23962417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Follow-up of probably benign lesions in non-screening breast diagnostics.
    Kapsimalakou S; Waldmann A; Katalinic A; Grande-Nagel I; Fischer D; Barkhausen J; Vogt FM
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):543-51. PubMed ID: 24722993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features.
    Ha SM; Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1087):20170787. PubMed ID: 29658793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Surgical office-based ultrasound of the breast.
    Staren ED
    Am Surg; 1995 Jul; 61(7):619-26; discussion 627. PubMed ID: 7793744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Value of BI-RADS ultrasonic scores of direct and indirect ultrasonographic signs in diagnosis of solid breast lesions].
    Gao JX; Yu XQ; Yao LH
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 33(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 21875490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Columnar cell lesions of the breast: mammographic and US features.
    Kim MJ; Kim EK; Oh KK; Park BW; Kim H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 60(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 16891081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.