These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 153465)

  • 1. Do second surgical opinion programs save?
    Mod Healthc; 1979 Feb; 9(2):7. PubMed ID: 153465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use and value of third surgical opinions.
    McCarthy EG; Tucker J; Astor L
    Health Cost Manage; 1987; 4(3):12-9. PubMed ID: 10317900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Second opinion programs: their potential for Medicaid.
    Sheridan K
    J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(4):9-16. PubMed ID: 10316830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Programs prove effective second surgical opinion.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1984 Oct; 39(4):56, 60, 64. PubMed ID: 10317554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Second opinion programs: continued savings from nonconfirmed surgeries.
    Chu A; Lavoie V; McCarthy EG
    Empl Benefits J; 1992 Sep; 17(3):35-40. PubMed ID: 10171221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Second opinion plans seen saving money.
    Piontek S
    Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1981 Feb; 85(8):1, 20-1. PubMed ID: 10317067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Second surgical opinions cut costs: study.
    Bus Insur; 1979 Oct; 13(22):87. PubMed ID: 10316895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A union's experience with a second opinion plan.
    Tilson E
    Bus Health; 1983 Dec; 1(2):9-12. PubMed ID: 10317436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A second look at second surgical opinions.
    Rosenberg SN; Perlis H; Lynne D; Leto L
    Bus Health; 1991 Feb; 9(2):14-6, 19, 22 passim. PubMed ID: 10170695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Second opinions in perspective.
    McCarthy EG
    Bus Health; 1983 Dec; 1(2):5-8. PubMed ID: 10317435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New York research says second opinion programs permanently defer surgery.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Oct; 31(4):32, 34. PubMed ID: 1037582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Second opinions and cost-effectiveness: the questions continue.
    Peebles RJ
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1991 Jun; 76(6):18-25. PubMed ID: 10170735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Second look at second opinions.
    Time; 1981 Jan; 117(1):87. PubMed ID: 10317037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a surgical second opinion program.
    Schachter M; Oppenheimer G; Cannoodt L; Sieverts S
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1983 Jan; 9(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 6403901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An update on second surgical opinion programs.
    Lance R; Haug JN
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1978 Dec; 63(12):26-34. PubMed ID: 10316749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Second surgical opinion programs: evaluation deficiencies.
    Dunham MH; Hunt VB
    Wis Med J; 1984 Apr; 83(4):23-4. PubMed ID: 6428066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Second opinion elective surgery program: a concept whose time has come?
    McCarthy EG; Finkel ML
    Empl Benefits J; 1979; 4(3):34-8. PubMed ID: 10316851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mandated second opinions save Prudential clients 6%.
    Fannin RA
    Bus Insur; 1979 Mar; 13(5):1, 48. PubMed ID: 10325175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Second opinion program reduces surgical procedures, produces no net savings.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Dec; 32(6):53-4. PubMed ID: 10316529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Second opinion plan approved.
    Am Med News; 1979 Mar; 22(13):1, 13. PubMed ID: 10325176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.