313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15346745)
1. Comparison of an allograft in an experimental putty carrier and a bovine-derived xenograft used in ridge preservation: a clinical and histologic study in humans.
Vance GS; Greenwell H; Miller RL; Hill M; Johnston H; Scheetz JP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 15346745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans.
Iasella JM; Greenwell H; Miller RL; Hill M; Drisko C; Bohra AA; Scheetz JP
J Periodontol; 2003 Jul; 74(7):990-9. PubMed ID: 12931761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ridge preservation comparing socket allograft alone to socket allograft plus facial overlay xenograft: a clinical and histologic study in humans.
Poulias E; Greenwell H; Hill M; Morton D; Vidal R; Shumway B; Peterson TL
J Periodontol; 2013 Nov; 84(11):1567-75. PubMed ID: 23339378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histologic comparison of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using two different xenograft protocols.
Cook DC; Mealey BL
J Periodontol; 2013 May; 84(5):585-94. PubMed ID: 22680300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical and histomorphometric study of calcium sulfate compared with freeze-dried bone allograft for alveolar ridge preservation.
Toloue SM; Chesnoiu-Matei I; Blanchard SB
J Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 83(7):847-55. PubMed ID: 22166162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study.
Barone A; Aldini NN; Fini M; Giardino R; Calvo Guirado JL; Covani U
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1370-7. PubMed ID: 18672985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histologic healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized versus combined mineralized-demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Borg TD; Mealey BL
J Periodontol; 2015 Mar; 86(3):348-55. PubMed ID: 25415247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of a putty-form hydroxyapatite matrix combined with the synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 on alveolar ridge preservation.
Neiva RF; Tsao YP; Eber R; Shotwell J; Billy E; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2008 Feb; 79(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 18251643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histologic comparison of healing after ridge preservation using human demineralized bone matrix putty with one versus two different-sized bone particles.
Hoang TN; Mealey BL
J Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 21692633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Mardas N; Chadha V; Donos N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):688-98. PubMed ID: 20636724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extraction socket preservation graft before implant placement with calcium sulfate hemihydrate and platelet-rich plasma: a clinical and histomorphometric study in humans.
Kutkut A; Andreana S; Kim HL; Monaco E
J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):401-9. PubMed ID: 21861639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ridge preservation with or without an osteoinductive allograft: a clinical, radiographic, micro-computed tomography, and histologic study evaluating dimensional changes and new bone formation of the alveolar ridge.
Brownfield LA; Weltman RL
J Periodontol; 2012 May; 83(5):581-9. PubMed ID: 21942791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical, histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of socket preservation using a synthetic nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in comparison with a bovine xenograft: a randomized clinical trial.
Gholami GA; Najafi B; Mashhadiabbas F; Goetz W; Najafi S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1198-204. PubMed ID: 22092485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histologic comparison of healing after tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized versus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft.
Wood RA; Mealey BL
J Periodontol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 21749166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of bovine porous bone mineral in combination with collagen membrane or autologous fibrinogen/fibronectin system for ridge preservation following tooth extraction.
Vasilic N; Henderson R; Jorgenson T; Sutherland E; Carson R
J Okla Dent Assoc; 2003; 93(4):33-8. PubMed ID: 12778623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of volumetric dimensional changes in posterior extraction sites with and without ARP using a novel imaging device.
Sbordone C; Toti P; Martuscelli R; Guidetti F; Porzio M; Sbordone L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 19(6):1044-1053. PubMed ID: 28905475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographic and histological evaluation of deproteinized bovine bone mineral vs. deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in ridge preservation. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Nart J; Barallat L; Jimenez D; Mestres J; Gómez A; Carrasco MA; Violant D; Ruíz-Magaz V
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):840-848. PubMed ID: 27335267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a resorbable membrane and particulated autogenous bone with or without anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 22 patients.
Urban IA; Nagursky H; Lozada JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):404-14. PubMed ID: 21483894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ridge preservation of the molar extraction socket using collagen sponge and xenogeneic bone grafts.
Kim YK; Yun PY; Lee HJ; Ahn JY; Kim SG
Implant Dent; 2011 Aug; 20(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 21753734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Socket preservation and sinus augmentation using a medical grade calcium sulfate hemihydrate and mineralized irradiated cancellous bone allograft composite.
Bagoff R; Mamidwar S; Chesnoiu-Matei I; Ricci JL; Alexander H; Tovar NM
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 21905884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
