128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15347007)
1. A comparison of simulator-tested and -retrieved cervical disc prostheses. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.
Anderson PA; Rouleau JP; Toth JM; Riew KD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Sep; 1(2):202-10. PubMed ID: 15347007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.
Anderson PA; Rouleau JP; Bryan VE; Carlson CS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S186-94. PubMed ID: 14560190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomaterial optimization in total disc arthroplasty.
Hallab N; Link HD; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S139-52. PubMed ID: 14560185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.
Mummaneni PV; Haid RW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Sep; 1(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 15347000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results.
Anderson PA; Sasso RC; Rouleau JP; Carlson CS; Goffin J
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):303S-309S. PubMed ID: 15541681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Polyethylene wear debris and long-term clinical failure of the Charité disc prosthesis: a study of 4 patients.
van Ooij A; Kurtz SM; Stessels F; Noten H; van Rhijn L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 17224818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Biologic Response to Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Wear Particles in Total Joint Replacement: A Systematic Review.
Stratton-Powell AA; Pasko KM; Brockett CL; Tipper JL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2394-2404. PubMed ID: 27432420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which design and biomaterial factors affect clinical wear performance of total disc replacements? A systematic review.
Veruva SY; Steinbeck MJ; Toth J; Alexander DD; Kurtz SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 472(12):3759-69. PubMed ID: 25002211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The natural history of polyethylene oxidation in total disc replacement.
Kurtz SM; MacDonald D; Ianuzzi A; van Ooij A; Isaza J; Ross ER; Regan J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2369-77. PubMed ID: 19789469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging clarity of the Bryan, Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and PCM cervical arthroplasty devices.
Sekhon LH; Duggal N; Lynch JJ; Haid RW; Heller JG; Riew KD; Seex K; Anderson PA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 17413473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis.
Anderson PA; Sasso RC; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1305-12. PubMed ID: 18496341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant failure of Bryan cervical disc due to broken polyurethane sheath: a case report.
Fan H; Wu S; Wu Z; Wang Z; Guo Z
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E814-6. PubMed ID: 22210017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro assessment of wear particulate generated from NUBAC: a PEEK-on-PEEK articulating nucleus replacement device: methodology and results from a series of wear tests using different motion profiles, test frequencies, and environmental conditions.
Brown T; Bao QB; Agrawal CM; Hallab NJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):E1675-85. PubMed ID: 21494194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extraction and characterization of metallic wear debris from total joint arthroplasty.
Schmiedberg SK; Jones LC; Chang DH; Hungerford DS; Frondoza CG
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2007; 43():104-9. PubMed ID: 17487065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternative bearing materials for intervertebral disc arthroplasty.
Grupp TM; Meisel HJ; Cotton JA; Schwiesau J; Fritz B; Blömer W; Jansson V
Biomaterials; 2010 Jan; 31(3):523-31. PubMed ID: 19815271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty.
Cunningham BW
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):219S-230S. PubMed ID: 15541670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty.
Fong SY; DuPlessis SJ; Casha S; Hurlbert RJ
Spine J; 2006; 6(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 16651216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A quantitative evaluation of inflammatory cells in human temporomandibular joint tissues from patients with and without implants.
Alonso A; Kaimal S; Look J; Swift J; Fricton J; Myers S; Kehl L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 19304036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
