These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15349691)

  • 21. Reproductive hormones monthly variation in free-ranging European wildcats: Lack of association with faecal marking.
    Piñeiro A; Hernández MC; Silván G; Illera JC; Barja I
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2020 Dec; 55(12):1784-1793. PubMed ID: 33070401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Deficiencies in Natura 2000 for protecting recovering large carnivores: A spotlight on the wolf Canis lupus in Poland.
    Diserens TA; Borowik T; Nowak S; Szewczyk M; Niedźwiecka N; Mysłajek RW
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184144. PubMed ID: 28873090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial and temporal variability in summer diet of gray wolves (
    Lodberg-Holm HK; Teglas BS; Tyers DB; Jimenez MD; Smith DW
    J Mammal; 2021 Aug; 102(4):1030-1041. PubMed ID: 34393668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using faecal DNA sampling and GIS to monitor hybridization between red wolves (Canis rufus) and coyotes (Canis latrans).
    Adams JR; Kelly BT; Waits LP
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Aug; 12(8):2175-86. PubMed ID: 12859637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impacts of breeder loss on social structure, reproduction and population growth in a social canid.
    Borg BL; Brainerd SM; Meier TJ; Prugh LR
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):177-87. PubMed ID: 25041127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wolves adapt territory size, not pack size to local habitat quality.
    Kittle AM; Anderson M; Avgar T; Baker JA; Brown GS; Hagens J; Iwachewski E; Moffatt S; Mosser A; Patterson BR; Reid DE; Rodgers AR; Shuter J; Street GM; Thompson ID; Vander Vennen LM; Fryxell JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Sep; 84(5):1177-86. PubMed ID: 25757794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A faecal analysis of helminth infections in wild and captive wolves, Canis lupus L., in Poland.
    Szafrańska E; Wasielewski O; Bereszyński A
    J Helminthol; 2010 Dec; 84(4):415-9. PubMed ID: 20236557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multi-trophic resource selection function enlightens the behavioural game between wolves and their prey.
    Courbin N; Fortin D; Dussault C; Fargeot V; Courtois R
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Sep; 82(5):1062-71. PubMed ID: 23701257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of problem-solving and spatial orientation in the wolf (Canis lupus) and dog (Canis familiaris).
    Hiestand L
    Behav Genet; 2011 Nov; 41(6):840-57. PubMed ID: 21365204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Protozoan and helminth parasite fauna of free-living Croatian wild wolves (Canis lupus) analyzed by scat collection.
    Hermosilla C; Kleinertz S; Silva LM; Hirzmann J; Huber D; Kusak J; Taubert A
    Vet Parasitol; 2017 Jan; 233():14-19. PubMed ID: 28043382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America.
    Carroll C; McRae BH; Brookes A
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 22010832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Legacy lost: genetic variability and population size of extirpated US grey wolves (Canis lupus).
    Leonard JA; Vilà C; Wayne RK
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15643947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The geographical distribution of grey wolves (
    Wang L; Ma YP; Zhou QJ; Zhang YP; Savolaimen P; Wang GD
    Zool Res; 2016 Nov; 37(6):315-326. PubMed ID: 28105796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hunting effects on favourable conservation status of highly inbred Swedish wolves.
    Laikre L; Jansson M; Allendorf FW; Jakobsson S; Ryman N
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 23282216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distinguishing the taphonomic signature of wolves from humans and other predators on small prey assemblages.
    Lloveras L; Nadal J; Fullola JM
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):8030. PubMed ID: 32415219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Decoding Group Vocalizations: The Acoustic Energy Distribution of Chorus Howls Is Useful to Determine Wolf Reproduction.
    Palacios V; López-Bao JV; Llaneza L; Fernández C; Font E
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0153858. PubMed ID: 27144887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Consensus on criteria for potential areas for wolf reintroduction in Mexico.
    Araiza M; Carrillo L; List R; González CA; Meyer EM; Martínez-Gutiérrez PG; Moctezuma O; Sánchez-Morales NE; Servín J
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Aug; 26(4):630-7. PubMed ID: 22809352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Home range formation in wolves due to scent marking.
    Briscoe BK; Lewis MA; Parrish SE
    Bull Math Biol; 2002 Mar; 64(2):261-84. PubMed ID: 11926117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pitfalls of applying adaptive management to a wolf population in Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario.
    Theberge JB; Theberge MT; Vucetich JA; Paquet PC
    Environ Manage; 2006 Apr; 37(4):451-60. PubMed ID: 16465565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Payments for Improved Ecostructure (PIE): Funding for the Coexistence of Humans and Wolves in Finland.
    Hiedanpää J; Kalliolevo H; Salo M; Pellikka J; Luoma M
    Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 58(3):518-33. PubMed ID: 27329113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.