These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1534986)

  • 21. Clinical Performance and Epidemiologic Aspects of Fractured Anterior Teeth Restored with a Composite Resin: A Two-Year Clinical Study.
    Vural UK; Kiremitçi A; Gökalp S
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e204-e209. PubMed ID: 28960769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(6):202-9. PubMed ID: 1840079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 7803009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Colour stability, staining and roughness of silorane after prolonged chemical challenges.
    Benetti AR; Ribeiro de Jesus VC; Martinelli NL; Pascotto RC; Poli-Frederico RC
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1229-35. PubMed ID: 24120922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
    Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A clinical comparison of three tooth-colored restorative resins.
    Davis RD; Mayhew RB; Voss JE
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1982; 61(5):9-12. PubMed ID: 6219164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations.
    Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8329161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vivo evaluation of the wear of restorative resin.
    Mitchem JC; Gronas DG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1982 Mar; 104(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 6949979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Two-year clinical evaluation of packable and nanostructured resin-based composites placed with two techniques.
    Monteiro PM; Manso MC; Gavinha S; Melo P
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Mar; 141(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 20194388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microhardness and porosity of Class 2 light-cured composite restorations cured with a transparent cone attached to the light-curing wand.
    Von Beetzen M; Li J; Nicander I; Sundström F
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8415161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal leakage of several acid-etch composite resin restorative systems.
    Amsberry W; von Fraunhofer JA; Hoots J; Rodgers H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Nov; 52(5):647-53. PubMed ID: 6238162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Durability of new restorative materials in Class III cavities.
    van Dijken JW
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11317385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth.
    Yasa B; Arslan H; Yasa E; Akcay M; Hatirli H
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 25982519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strengths of two different gingiva-colored materials bonded to commercially pure titanium and acrylic artificial teeth.
    Elzarug YA; Galburt RB; Ali A; Finkelman M; Dam HG
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 24521462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A 12-year clinical evaluation of a three-step dentin adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 May; 140(5):526-35. PubMed ID: 19411519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical evaluation of light-cured anterior resin composites over periods of up to 4 years.
    Smales RJ; Gerke DC
    Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):208-12. PubMed ID: 1290611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.