54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15349981)
1. Rapid review of liquid-based smears as a quality control measure.
Henderson S; Stevens M; Walker T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Sep; 31(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 15349981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assuring the quality of quality assurance: seeding abnormal slides into the negative Papanicolaou smears that will be rapid rescreened.
Clarke J; Thurloe JK; Bowditch RC; Roberts JM
Cancer; 2008 Oct; 114(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 18618517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid prescreening of Papanicolaou smears: a practical and efficient quality control strategy.
Djemli A; Khetani K; Auger M
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 108(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16302251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The sensitivity of rapid (partial) review of cervical smears.
Shield PW; Cox NC
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 9577734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Herpesvirus mimics. A potential pitfall in endocervical brush specimens.
Stowell SB; Wiley CM; Powers CN
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8291354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significance of a diagnosis of microorganisms on pap smear.
Fitzhugh VA; Heller DS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Jan; 12(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 18162813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of reporting endocervical component adequacy--a continuous quality improvement project.
Roberson J; Connolly K; St John K; Eltoum I; Chhieng DC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12203868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Weekly rescreening of 10% of the total cervical Papanicolaou smears: a worthwhile quality assurance scheme.
Sampatanukul P; Wannakrairot P; Promprakob U; Yodavudh S; Anansiriprapa C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Sep; 87 Suppl 2():S261-5. PubMed ID: 16083199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Whole, Turret and step methods of rapid rescreening: is there any difference in performance?
Montemor EB; Roteli-Martins CM; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG; Fonsechi-Carvasan GA; Shirata NK; Utagawa ML; Longatto-Filho A; Syrjanen KJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Jan; 35(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17173293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Value of a computer-assisted screening method (PAPNET) for the detection of infectious cervico-uterine smears].
Bernier M; Bergemer AM; Got C; Marsan C
Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1998; 46(3):184-7. PubMed ID: 9754374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme.
Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Unusual cytologic aspects of cervico-vaginal trichomoniasis. Study of cervico-vaginal smears stained by the Papanicolaou's method].
Phat VN; Baviera E; Thevenon-Gonguet AM; Houissa-Vuong S; Schoonaert MF; Barres D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1984; 13(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 6203958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proteomic analysis of high-grade dysplastic cervical cells obtained from ThinPrep slides using laser capture microdissection and mass spectrometry.
Gu Y; Wu SL; Meyer JL; Hancock WS; Burg LJ; Linder J; Hanlon DW; Karger BL
J Proteome Res; 2007 Nov; 6(11):4256-68. PubMed ID: 17902640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of Thinprep Imaging System in detecting atypical glandular cells.
Jayamohan Y; Karabakhtsian RG; Banks HW; Davey DD
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jul; 37(7):479-82. PubMed ID: 19185007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of 100% rapid rescreening of negative cervical smears as a quality assurance measure.
Manrique EJ; Amaral RG; Souza NL; Tavares SB; Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC
Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):116-20. PubMed ID: 16719853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of the ThinPrep Pap test and conventional cytology results in a Canadian cohort.
Duggan MA; Khalil M; Brasher PM; Nation JG
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16548991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Resolution of equivocal results with the Hybrid Capture II high-risk HPV DNA test: a cytologic/histologic review of 191 cases.
Knoepp SM; Kuebler DL; Wilbur DC
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2007 Sep; 16(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 17721319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Resolving ASCUS without recourse to HPV testing: manual reprocessing of residual automated liquid-based cytology (ALBC) material using manual liquid-based cytology (MLBC).
Maksem JA; Bedrossian CW; Kurtycz D; Sewall S; Shalkham J; Dhanwada V; Lind H; Bibbo M; Weidmann J; Kane B; Shi Fu Y
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Dec; 33(6):434-40. PubMed ID: 16299747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and fluid-based, thin-layer cytology with colposcopic biopsy control in central Italy: a consecutive sampling study of 461 cases.
Rahimi S; Carnovale-Scalzo C; Marani C; Renzi C; Malvasi A; Votano S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jan; 37(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18973131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
