BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15350197)

  • 1. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
    Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FDR-controlling testing procedures and sample size determination for microarrays.
    Li SS; Bigler J; Lampe JW; Potter JD; Feng Z
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2267-80. PubMed ID: 15977294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Iterative class discovery and feature selection using Minimal Spanning Trees.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():126. PubMed ID: 15355552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Leveraging two-way probe-level block design for identifying differential gene expression with high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
    Barrera L; Benner C; Tao YC; Winzeler E; Zhou Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 5():42. PubMed ID: 15099405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A microarray gene expression study of the molecular pharmacology of lithium carbonate on mouse brain mRNA to understand the neurobiology of mood stabilization and treatment of bipolar affective disorder.
    McQuillin A; Rizig M; Gurling HM
    Pharmacogenet Genomics; 2007 Aug; 17(8):605-17. PubMed ID: 17622937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
    van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting differentially expressed genes by relative entropy.
    Yan X; Deng M; Fung WK; Qian M
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Jun; 234(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 15784273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian determination of threshold for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
    Chen J; Sarkar SK
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3174-89. PubMed ID: 16345048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
    Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
    Chen JJ; Wang SJ; Tsai CA; Lin CJ
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2007 Jun; 7(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 16940966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of two multivariate permutation methods for controlling the false discovery proportion.
    Korn EL; Li MC; McShane LM; Simon R
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(24):4428-40. PubMed ID: 17357994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the gene-specific dye bias in cDNA microarray experiments.
    Martin-Magniette ML; Aubert J; Cabannes E; Daudin JJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 15691855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
    Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative review of estimates of the proportion unchanged genes and the false discovery rate.
    Broberg P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 6():199. PubMed ID: 16086831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A two-step multiple comparison procedure for a large number of tests and multiple treatments.
    Jiang H; Doerge RW
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article28. PubMed ID: 17402912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An improved nonparametric approach for detecting differentially expressed genes with replicated microarray data.
    Zhang S
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article30. PubMed ID: 17402914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.