279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15350197)
21. A comparative review of estimates of the proportion unchanged genes and the false discovery rate.
Broberg P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 6():199. PubMed ID: 16086831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A two-step multiple comparison procedure for a large number of tests and multiple treatments.
Jiang H; Doerge RW
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article28. PubMed ID: 17402912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Shrinkage estimation of effect sizes as an alternative to hypothesis testing followed by estimation in high-dimensional biology: applications to differential gene expression.
Montazeri Z; Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article23. PubMed ID: 20597849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Estimation of gene induction enables a relevance-based ranking of gene sets.
Bartholomé K; Kreutz C; Timmer J
J Comput Biol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):959-67. PubMed ID: 19580524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An improved nonparametric approach for detecting differentially expressed genes with replicated microarray data.
Zhang S
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article30. PubMed ID: 17402914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of false discovery rate methods in identifying genes with differential expression.
Qian HR; Huang S
Genomics; 2005 Oct; 86(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 16054333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long versus short oligonucleotide microarrays for the study of gene expression in nonhuman primates.
Walker SJ; Wang Y; Grant KA; Chan F; Hellmann GM
J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Apr; 152(1-2):179-89. PubMed ID: 16253343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MOST: detecting cancer differential gene expression.
Lian H
Biostatistics; 2008 Jul; 9(3):411-8. PubMed ID: 18048648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
Liu P; Hwang JT
Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modeling microarray data using a threshold mixture model.
Kauermann G; Eilers P
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):376-87. PubMed ID: 15180663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of a statistical equivalence test applied to microarray data.
Qiu J; Cui X
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 20309757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
Jung SH
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Significance analysis of ROC indices for comparing diagnostic markers: applications to gene microarray data.
Tsai CA; Chen JJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Nov; 14(4):985-1003. PubMed ID: 15587976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A gene selection algorithm based on the gene regulation probability using maximal likelihood estimation.
Wang HQ; Huang DS
Biotechnol Lett; 2005 Apr; 27(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 15973495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Identification of differentially expressed gene categories in microarray studies using nonparametric multivariate analysis.
Nettleton D; Recknor J; Reecy JM
Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 18042553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Challenges in projecting clustering results across gene expression-profiling datasets.
Lusa L; McShane LM; Reid JF; De Cecco L; Ambrogi F; Biganzoli E; Gariboldi M; Pierotti MA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1715-23. PubMed ID: 18000217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Understanding sample size: what determines the required number of microarrays for an experiment?
Jørstad TS; Langaas M; Bones AM
Trends Plant Sci; 2007 Feb; 12(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 17229587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Gene expression profiling reveals intrinsic differences between T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma.
Raetz EA; Perkins SL; Bhojwani D; Smock K; Philip M; Carroll WL; Min DJ
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2006 Aug; 47(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 16358311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A moment-based method for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and its application to microarray gene expression data.
Lai Y
Biostatistics; 2007 Oct; 8(4):744-55. PubMed ID: 17244594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Selecting differentially expressed genes using minimum probability of classification error.
Mahata P; Mahata K
J Biomed Inform; 2007 Dec; 40(6):775-86. PubMed ID: 17950675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
