BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15350373)

  • 1. Frozen section examination of pelvic lymph nodes in endometrial and cervical cancer: accuracy in patients submitted to neoadjuvant treatments.
    Fanfani F; Ludovisi M; Zannoni GF; Distefano M; Fagotti A; Ceccaroni M; Mancuso S; Scambia G
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Sep; 94(3):779-84. PubMed ID: 15350373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is intraoperative frozen section analysis of pelvic lymph nodes accurate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with cervical cancer?
    Bader AA; Winter R; Moinfar F; Petru E; Pristauz G; Scholz HS; Haas J; Tamussino KF
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Oct; 103(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 16564076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is frozen section analysis of pelvic lymph nodes accurate in locally advanced cervical cancer patients administered preoperative chemoradiation?
    Ferrandina G; Fanfani F; Ludovisi M; Fagotti A; Carbone A; Zannoni G; Guerriero M; Petrillo M; Scambia G
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jan; 108(1):220-5. PubMed ID: 17976708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is there a place for a less extensive radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer patients?
    Scambia G; Ferrandina G; Distefano M; Fagotti A; Manfredi R; Zannoni GF; Mancuso S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Nov; 83(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 11606092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Indications and results of extemporaneous examination of pelvic lymph nodes in the surgical strategy of stage Ib or II cancers of the cervix uteri].
    Morice P; Sabourin JC; Pautier P; Mercier S; Duvillard P; Castaigne D
    Ann Chir; 1999; 53(7):583-6. PubMed ID: 10520497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. HPV status in sentinel nodes might be a prognostic factor in cervical cancer.
    Lee YS; Rhim CC; Lee HN; Lee KH; Park JS; Namkoong SE
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 May; 105(2):351-7. PubMed ID: 17275890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of patients after extraperitoneal lymph node dissection for cervical cancer.
    Denschlag D; Gabriel B; Mueller-Lantzsch C; Tempfer C; Henne K; Gitsch G; Hasenburg A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):658-64. PubMed ID: 15721408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frozen section of lymph nodes in uterine cervical carcinoma.
    Morice P; Sabourin JC; Castaigne D; Mercier S; Pautier P; Spatz A; Duvillard P; Michel G
    Clin Exp Pathol; 1999; 47(5):223-6. PubMed ID: 10598370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of frozen section for lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for carcinoma of the cervix.
    Bjornsson BL; Nelson BE; Reale FR; Rose PG
    Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Oct; 51(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 8244175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic detection of sentinel lymph nodes using blue dye in women with cervical and endometrial cancer.
    Holub Z; Jabor A; Lukac J; Kliment L
    Med Sci Monit; 2004 Oct; 10(10):CR587-91. PubMed ID: 15448599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utility of frozen-section evaluation of lymph nodes in the staging of bronchogenic carcinoma at mediastinoscopy and thoracotomy.
    Gephardt GN; Rice TW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Dec; 100(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 2246907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analysis of the sentinel lymph nodes during breast cancer surgery.
    Khalifa K; Pereira B; Thomas VA; Mokbel K
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2004; 49(5):208-11. PubMed ID: 15633476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early stage cervical cancer: adjuvant treatment in negative lymph node cases.
    Sartori E; Tisi G; Chiudinelli F; La Face B; Franzini R; Pecorelli S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S170-4. PubMed ID: 17765298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The accuracy of intraoperative frozen section of the inguinal sentinel lymph node in vulvar cancer.
    Brunner AH; Polterauer S; Tempfer C; Joura E; Reinthaller A; Horvat R; Hefler L
    Anticancer Res; 2008; 28(6B):4091-4. PubMed ID: 19192665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive endometrial cancer patients.
    Mariani A; Dowdy SC; Cliby WA; Haddock MG; Keeney GL; Lesnick TG; Podratz KC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 16510174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability of mediastinoscopic frozen sections in deciding on oncological surgery in bronchogenic carcinoma.
    Sanli M; Isik AF; Tuncozgur B; Akar E; Deniz H; Bakir K; Elbeyli L
    Adv Ther; 2008 May; 25(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 18523735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lymph-vascular space invasion and number of positive para-aortic node groups predict survival in node-positive patients with endometrial cancer.
    Watari H; Todo Y; Takeda M; Ebina Y; Yamamoto R; Sakuragi N
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 15721407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cervical and endometrial cancers: a feasibility study].
    Lelièvre L; Camatte S; Le Frère-Belda MA; Kerrou K; Froissart M; Taurelle R; Vildé F; Lécuru F
    Bull Cancer; 2004 Apr; 91(4):379-84. PubMed ID: 15242323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of preoperative criteria used to predict lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.
    Han SS; Lee SH; Kim DH; Kim JW; Park NH; Kang SB; Song YS
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010; 89(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 19916890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of intraoperative pathological examination of SLN in cervical cancer.
    Martínez A; Mery E; Filleron T; Boileau L; Ferron G; Querleu D
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Sep; 130(3):525-9. PubMed ID: 23500089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.