254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15350714)
1. Manual versus automated methods for cleaning reusable accessory devices used for minimally invasive surgical procedures.
Alfa MJ; Nemes R
J Hosp Infect; 2004 Sep; 58(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 15350714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Manual methods are suboptimal compared with automated methods for cleaning of single-use biopsy forceps.
Alfa MJ; Nemes R; Olson N; Mulaire A
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 27(8):841-6. PubMed ID: 16874645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inadequacy of manual cleaning for reprocessing single-use, triple-lumen sphinctertomes: simulated-use testing comparing manual with automated cleaning methods.
Alfa MJ; Nemes R
Am J Infect Control; 2003 Jun; 31(4):193-207. PubMed ID: 12806356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated washing with the Reliance Endoscope Processing System and its equivalence to optimal manual cleaning.
Alfa MJ; Olson N; DeGagne P
Am J Infect Control; 2006 Nov; 34(9):561-70. PubMed ID: 17097450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monitoring and improving the effectiveness of cleaning medical and surgical devices.
Alfa MJ
Am J Infect Control; 2013 May; 41(5 Suppl):S56-9. PubMed ID: 23622750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Specific hygiene issues relating to reprocessing and reuse of single-use devices for laparoscopic surgery.
Roth K; Heeg P; Reichl R
Surg Endosc; 2002 Jul; 16(7):1091-7. PubMed ID: 12165829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodology of reprocessing reusable accessories.
Alfa MJ
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):361-78. PubMed ID: 10683221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated processing of endoscopic surgical instruments.
Roth K; Sieber JP; Schrimm H; Heeg P; Buess G
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1994 Oct; 2(5):279-81. PubMed ID: 7866765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reprocessing safety issues associated with complex-design orthopaedic loaned surgical instruments and implants.
Costa DM; Lopes LKO; Vickery K; Watanabe E; Vasconcelos LSNOL; de Paula MC; Melo DS; Hu H; Deva AK; Tipple AFV
Injury; 2018 Nov; 49(11):2005-2012. PubMed ID: 30236794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro study and in vivo application of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Brandabur JJ; Patterson DJ; Ball TJ; Gluck MG; Sumida SE; Roach SK; Drajpuch DE; Irizarry DL
Endoscopy; 2001 May; 33(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 11396756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reprocessing anesthesia instruments and devices.
Ball K
CRNA; 2000 Feb; 11(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 11271035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Assessment of the sterilization of medical devices--an important challenge to health care in Poland].
Röhm-Rodowald E; Jakimiak B
Przegl Epidemiol; 2004; 58(3):501-10. PubMed ID: 15730015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A quantitative assessment of residual protein levels on dental instruments reprocessed by manual, ultrasonic and automated cleaning methods.
Vassey M; Budge C; Poolman T; Jones P; Perrett D; Nayuni N; Bennett P; Groves P; Smith A; Fulford M; Marsh PD; Walker JT; Sutton JM; Raven ND
Br Dent J; 2011 May; 210(9):E14. PubMed ID: 21372833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complex design of surgical instruments as barrier for cleaning effectiveness, favouring biofilm formation.
Lopes LKO; Costa DM; Tipple AFV; Watanabe E; Castillo RB; Hu H; Deva AK; Vickery K
J Hosp Infect; 2019 Sep; 103(1):e53-e60. PubMed ID: 30423413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decontaminated single-use devices: an oxymoron that may be placing patients at risk for cross-contamination.
Heeg P; Roth K; Reichl R; Cogdill CP; Bond WW
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Sep; 22(9):542-9. PubMed ID: 11732782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardized reprocessing of reusable colonoscopy biopsy forceps is effective: results of a German multicenter study.
Jung M; Beilenhoff U; Pietsch M; Kraft B; Rippin G
Endoscopy; 2003 Mar; 35(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 12584636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Steam sterilization of laparoscopic instruments.
Voyles CR; Sanders DL; Simons JE; McVey EA; Wilson WB
Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1995 Apr; 5(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 7773462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protein cross-contamination during batch cleaning and autoclaving of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
Richards E; Brimacombe J; Laupau W; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2006 May; 61(5):431-3. PubMed ID: 16674615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Freely accessible endoscope channels improve efficacy of cleaning.
Dietze B; Kircheis U; Schwarz I; Martiny H
Endoscopy; 2001 Jun; 33(6):523-8. PubMed ID: 11437047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preparation of instruments used in minimally invasive surgery in a washer-disinfector.
Michels W
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1994 Oct; 2(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 7866763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
