BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15350955)

  • 1. Endogeneity bias in the absence of unobserved heterogeneity.
    Berg GD; Mansley EC
    Ann Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 14(8):561-5. PubMed ID: 15350955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The back-step method--method for obtaining unbiased population parameter estimates for ordered categorical data.
    Kjellsson MC; Jönsson S; Karlsson MO
    AAPS J; 2004 Aug; 6(3):e19. PubMed ID: 15760104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Econometric approaches to epidemiologic data: relating endogeneity and unobserved heterogeneity to confounding.
    Zohoori N; Savitz DA
    Ann Epidemiol; 1997 May; 7(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 9177107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the nonparametric estimation method in NONMEM VI.
    Savic RM; Kjellsson MC; Karlsson MO
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Apr; 37(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 19159684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A joint econometric analysis of seat belt use and crash-related injury severity.
    Eluru N; Bhat CR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Sep; 39(5):1037-49. PubMed ID: 17854577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulation sample sizes for Monte Carlo partial EVPI calculations.
    Oakley JE; Brennan A; Tappenden P; Chilcott J
    J Health Econ; 2010 May; 29(3):468-77. PubMed ID: 20378190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MCMC estimation for the p(2) network regression model with crossed random effects.
    Zijlstra BJ; van Duijn MA; Snijders TA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):143-66. PubMed ID: 19208289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating linear regression models in the presence of a censored independent variable.
    Austin PC; Hoch JS
    Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(3):411-29. PubMed ID: 14748036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.
    Hossain S; Gustafson P
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generalized linear latent variable models for repeated measures of spatially correlated multivariate data.
    Zhu J; Eickhoff JC; Yan P
    Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):674-83. PubMed ID: 16135018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling late entry bias in survival analysis.
    Matsuura M; Eguchi S
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 16011705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polychotomization of continuous variables in regression models based on the overall C index.
    Tsuruta H; Bax L
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Dec; 6():41. PubMed ID: 17169154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculating partial expected value of perfect information via Monte Carlo sampling algorithms.
    Brennan A; Kharroubi S; O'hagan A; Chilcott J
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(4):448-70. PubMed ID: 17761960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple comparisons distortions of parameter estimates.
    Jeffries NO
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):500-4. PubMed ID: 16971376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical models for autocorrelated count data.
    Nelson KP; Leroux BG
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(8):1413-30. PubMed ID: 16196078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
    Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of genetic effects of major genes and polygenes on quantitative traits I. Genetic model for diploid plants and animals.
    Lou XY; Zhu J
    Theor Appl Genet; 2002 Feb; 104(2-3):414-421. PubMed ID: 12582714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.