75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15351224)
1. Response patterns to a postal survey using a cervical screening register as the sampling frame.
Olowokure B; Caswell M; Duggal HV
Public Health; 2004 Oct; 118(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 15351224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can breast and cervical cancer screening visits be used to enhance colorectal cancer screening?
Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Ellis J; Bernstein SJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):769-76. PubMed ID: 17411698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survey of population coverage in cervical cancer screening in the Oxford region.
Coulter A; Baldwin A
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Oct; 37(303):441-3. PubMed ID: 3505283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond the Pap: assessing patients' priorities for the annual examination.
Becker HI; Longacre MR; Harper DM
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Sep; 13(7):791-8. PubMed ID: 15385073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical screening in HIV-positive women: characteristics of those who default and attitudes towards screening.
Shah S; Montgomery H; Smith C; Madge S; Walker P; Evans H; Johnson M; Sabin C
HIV Med; 2006 Jan; 7(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16313292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Associations in breast and colon cancer screening behavior in women.
Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Patterson SK; Bernstein SJ
Acad Radiol; 2005 Apr; 12(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 15831418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What women want: convenient appointment times for cervical screening tests.
Olowokure B; Caswell M; Duggal HV
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2006 Dec; 15(5):489-92. PubMed ID: 17177908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Media interventions to increase cervical screening uptake in South Africa: an evaluation study of effectiveness.
Risi L; Bindman JP; Campbell OM; Imrie J; Everett K; Bradley J; Denny L
Health Educ Res; 2004 Aug; 19(4):457-68. PubMed ID: 15155598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reasons for non-attendance at cervical screening as reported by non-attendees in Sweden.
Oscarsson MG; Benzein EG; Wijma BE
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Mar; 29(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 18266164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why do women participate in the English cervical cancer screening programme?
Whynes DK; Philips Z; Avis M
J Health Econ; 2007 Mar; 26(2):306-25. PubMed ID: 17010459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recruitment methods and differences in early, late and non-respondents in the first MONICA-Catalonia population survey.
Rodes A; Sans S; Balaña LL; Paluzie G; Aguilera R; Balaguer-Vintro I
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1990; 38(5-6):447-53. PubMed ID: 2082450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Awareness of breast and cervical cancer risk factors and screening behaviours among nurses in rural region of Turkey.
Yaren A; Ozkilinc G; Guler A; Oztop I
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2008 May; 17(3):278-84. PubMed ID: 18419631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Demographic, risk factor, and knowledge differences between Latinas and non-Latinas referred to colposcopy.
del Carmen MG; Findley M; Muzikansky A; Roche M; Verrill CL; Horowitz N; Seiden MV
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jan; 104(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 16949138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Obtaining health information from farmers: interviews versus postal questionnaires in a New Zealand case study.
Morgaine KC; Firth HM; Herbison GP; Feyer AM; McBride DI
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2005; 12(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 16457477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-response bias in a postal questionnaire survey on respiratory health in the old and very old.
Hardie JA; Bakke PS; Mørkve O
Scand J Public Health; 2003; 31(6):411-7. PubMed ID: 14675932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The psychological costs of inadequate cervical smear test results: three-month follow-up.
French DP; Maissi E; Marteau TM
Psychooncology; 2006 Jun; 15(6):498-508. PubMed ID: 16184520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
