These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15351224)

  • 21. The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records.
    Canfell K; Beral V; Green J; Cameron R; Baker K; Brown A
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 16792828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer and screening among Malaysian women who have never had a Pap smear: a qualitative study.
    Wong LP; Wong YL; Low WY; Khoo EM; Shuib R
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Jan; 50(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 19224084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice related to cervical cancer screening among Kuwaiti women.
    Al Sairafi M; Mohamed FA
    Med Princ Pract; 2009; 18(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 19060489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differences in predictors of cervical and breast cancer screening by screening need in uninsured Latino women.
    Buki LP; Jamison J; Anderson CJ; Cuadra AM
    Cancer; 2007 Oct; 110(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 17696119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attitudes and beliefs about cervical smear testing in ever-married Jordanian women.
    Amarin ZO; Badria LF; Obeidat BR
    East Mediterr Health J; 2008; 14(2):389-97. PubMed ID: 18561732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Screening history of women in Malmö with invasive cervical cancer.
    Lindqvist PG; Hellsten C; Rippe A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Mar; 137(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 17210219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hispanic acculturation and utilization of cervical cancer screening in the US.
    Shah M; Zhu K; Wu H; Potter J
    Prev Med; 2006 Feb; 42(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 16297444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Social support and cervical and breast cancer screening in Argentinean women from a rural population.
    Gamarra CJ; Paz EP; Griep RH
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 19386062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A case-control study of the protective benefit of cervical screening against invasive cervical cancer in NSW women.
    Yang B; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Roder D; Tracey E; Jelfs P
    Cancer Causes Control; 2008 Aug; 19(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 18286380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Current techniques in screening for cervical cancer in Spain: updated recommendations.
    Puig-Tintoré LM; Torné A; Alonso I
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Sep; 110(3 Suppl 2):S8-S10. PubMed ID: 18606440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
    Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Coverage and factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from the AFRODITA study: a population-based survey in Spain.
    Puig-Tintoré LM; Castellsagué X; Torné A; de Sanjosé S; Cortés J; Roura E; Méndez C; Bosch FX
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Apr; 12(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 18369300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Women's perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical screening: results from a population based study in India.
    Basu P; Sarkar S; Mukherjee S; Ghoshal M; Mittal S; Biswas S; Mandal R; Sankaranarayanan R
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 16963194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cervical cancer screening in the Ferrara Local Health Authority catchment area.
    Bergamini M; Buriani O; Cucchi A; De Togni A; Carpanelli MC; Cervato K; Gigli F; Pizzo F; Ravasini G; Rauli G; Rizzello R; Gregorio P
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2007 Dec; 48(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 18557309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Self-sampling and reminder letters increase participation in the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme].
    Virtanen A; Nieminen P; Malila N; Luostarinen T; Anttila A
    Duodecim; 2013; 129(16):1709-17. PubMed ID: 24069641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stage of adoption and impact of direct-mail communications with and without phone intervention on Chinese women's cervical smear screening behavior.
    Hou SI
    Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):749-56. PubMed ID: 16120455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
    de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study.
    Chew-Graham C; Mole E; Evans LJ; Rogers A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jun; 61(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 15964735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. More information equates with less anxiety. Reducing anxiety in cervical screening.
    Foxwell M; Alder E
    Prof Nurse; 1993 Oct; 9(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 8415785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do postal health surveys capture morbidity and mortality in respondents aged 65 years and older? A register-based validation study.
    Kelfve S; Lennartsson C; Agahi N; Modig K
    Scand J Public Health; 2015 Jun; 43(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 25754866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.