BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15351256)

  • 1. Mammographic casting-type calcification associated with small screen-detected invasive breast cancers: is this a reliable prognostic indicator?
    Peacock C; Given-Wilson R; Duffy S
    Clin Radiol; 2004 Sep; 59(9):855. PubMed ID: 15351256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic casting-type calcification associated with small screen-detected invasive breast cancers: is this a reliable prognostic indicator?
    Peacock C; Given-Wilson RM; Duffy SW
    Clin Radiol; 2004 Feb; 59(2):165-70; discussion 163-4. PubMed ID: 14746787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1-14-mm invasive breast carcinoma.
    Tabar L; Tony Chen HH; Amy Yen MF; Tot T; Tung TH; Chen LS; Chiu YH; Duffy SW; Smith RA
    Cancer; 2004 Oct; 101(8):1745-59. PubMed ID: 15386334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the presence of mammographic comedo calcification really a prognostic factor for small screen-detected invasive breast cancers?
    James JJ; Evans AJ; Pinder SE; Macmillan RD; Wilson AR; Ellis IO
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Jan; 58(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 12565206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic follow-up of clustered microcalcifications.
    Hall FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1550-1. PubMed ID: 7484612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass.
    Stomper PC; Geradts J; Edge SB; Levine EG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1679-84. PubMed ID: 14627596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The complete disintegration of microcalcification in a ductal invasive breast carcinoma].
    Schwarz E; Hagen D; Elsässer M
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):514-5. PubMed ID: 10370418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The detection of ductal carcinoma in situ at mammographic screening enables the diagnosis of small, grade 3 invasive tumours.
    Evans AJ; Pinder SE; Snead DR; Wilson AR; Ellis IO; Elston CW
    Br J Cancer; 1997; 75(4):542-4. PubMed ID: 9052407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of stellate mammographic pattern with survival in small invasive breast tumors.
    Alexander MC; Yankaskas BC; Biesemier KW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 16794151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammographic bi-dimensional product: a powerful predictor of successful excision of ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Evans A; Clements K; Maxwell A; Dobson H; Wallis M; Lawrence G; Bishop H; Sloane Project Steering Group
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Aug; 62(8):787-91. PubMed ID: 17604769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast imaging and computer-aided detection.
    Hall FM
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(14):1464-6. PubMed ID: 17409329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local tumor recurrence following breast-conservation therapy: correlation of histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic findings.
    Giess CS; Keating DM; Osborne MP; Rosenblatt R
    Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 10478253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel method for prediction of long-term outcome of women with T1a, T1b, and 10-14 mm invasive breast cancers: a prospective study.
    Tabár L; Chen HH; Duffy SW; Yen MF; Chiang CF; Dean PB; Smith RA
    Lancet; 2000 Feb; 355(9202):429-33. PubMed ID: 10841122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Invasive breast cancer: mammographic measurement.
    Flanagan FL; McDermott MB; Barton PT; Pilgram TK; Dehdashti F; Wick MR; Monsees BS
    Radiology; 1996 Jun; 199(3):819-23. PubMed ID: 8638011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lesion detection in breast carcinoma.
    Mortier M; Villeirs G; Kunnen M
    J Belge Radiol; 1997 Apr; 80(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 9237420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features with pathologic correlation.
    Evans AJ; Pinder S; Ellis IO; Sibbering M; Elston CW; Poller DN; Wilson R
    Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):237-40. PubMed ID: 8134579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resolving breast microcalcifications.
    Seymour H; Given-Wilson R; Wilkinson L; Cooke J
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(2):307-8. PubMed ID: 10715332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast imaging case of the day. Recurrent infiltrating ductal carcinoma and radiation-induced dystrophic calcifications.
    Parker CP; Kalisher L
    Radiographics; 1997; 17(4):1011-3. PubMed ID: 9225400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammography of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: review of 909 cases with radiographic-pathologic correlations.
    Barreau B; de Mascarel I; Feuga C; MacGrogan G; Dilhuydy MH; Picot V; Dilhuydy JM; de Lara CT; Bussières E; Schreer I
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 54(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 15797293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationships between age, mammographic features and pathological tumour characteristics in non-palpable breast cancer.
    Ferranti C; Coopmans de Yoldi G; Biganzoli E; Bergonzi S; Mariani L; Scaperrotta G; Marchesini M
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 73(871):698-705. PubMed ID: 11089459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.