103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15351256)
21. Technology limitation not recognized.
Avery JK
Tenn Med; 1998 Feb; 91(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 9478122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and pathologic findings.
Evans A; Pinder S; Wilson R; Sibbering M; Poller D; Elston C; Ellis I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1307-11. PubMed ID: 8191988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mammographic features of local recurrence in women who have undergone breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Liberman L; Van Zee KJ; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Samli B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):489-93. PubMed ID: 9016233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications.
Moon WK; Im JG; Koh YH; Noh DY; Park IA
Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):849-54. PubMed ID: 11110953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [40 years of progress in breast imaging].
De Maulmont C; Cherel P; Ouhioun O; Becette V; Stevens D; Plantet MM; Hagay C
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2000 Nov; 48(9):801-11. PubMed ID: 11141915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Findings at mammographic screening on only one standard projection: outcomes analysis.
Sickles EA
Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):471-5. PubMed ID: 9680578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Classification of ductal carcinoma in situ by image analysis of calcifications from digital mammograms.
Parker J; Dance DR; Davies DH; Yeoman LJ; Michell MJ; Humphreys S
Br J Radiol; 1995 Feb; 68(806):150-9. PubMed ID: 7735745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Computer-aided segmentation, form analysis and classification of 2975 breast microcalcifications using 7-fold microfocus magnification mammography].
Grunert JH; Khalifa R; Gmelin E
Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1759-65. PubMed ID: 15573286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of mammographic calcification.
Flowers WM; Launey DS
J Miss State Med Assoc; 1992 Sep; 33(9):319-21. PubMed ID: 1447768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Non-palpable breast carcinomas: correlation of mammographically detected malignant-appearing microcalcifications and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family expression.
Badra FA; Karamouzis MV; Ravazoula P; Likaki-Karatza E; Tzorakoleftherakis E; Koukouras D; Iconomou G; Xiros N; Siablis D; Papavassiliou AG; Kalofonos HP
Cancer Lett; 2006 Nov; 244(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 16517064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mammographic findings of recurrent breast cancer after lumpectomy and radiation therapy: comparison with the primary tumor.
Philpotts LE; Lee CH; Haffty BG; Lange RC; Tocino I
Radiology; 1996 Dec; 201(3):767-71. PubMed ID: 8939229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Breast microcalcifications: multivariate analysis of radiologic and clinical factors for carcinoma.
Fondrinier E; Lorimier G; Guerin-Boblet V; Bertrand AF; Mayras C; Dauver N
World J Surg; 2002 Mar; 26(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 11865363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Breast carcinoma: successful early diagnosis, increased mortality].
Paterok EM; Siebzehnrübl E; Schulz-Wendtland R; Koch T
Rontgenpraxis; 1995 May; 48(5):125-31. PubMed ID: 7792664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Tungsten particles mimicking the microcalcifications seen in ductal carcinoma in situ.
Bessell-Browne R; Beer T; Wylie E
Australas Radiol; 2006 Feb; 50(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 16499738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Digital full field mammography: physical principles and clinical aspects].
Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(5-6):171-7. PubMed ID: 10574025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Ductal carcinoma in situ: the mammographer's perspective.
Stomper PC; Margolin FR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):585-91. PubMed ID: 8109501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Preoperative hook wire marking of nonpalpable suspected breast lesions].
Sötje G; Waschkies R; Burba H; Freitag F; Baron Y
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):253-5. PubMed ID: 9409998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dilated duct pattern at mammography.
Huynh PT; Parellada JA; de Paredes ES; Harvey J; Smith D; Holley L; Maxin M
Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 9205235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
Poplack SP; Wells WA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jun; 170(6):1543-9. PubMed ID: 9609171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Digital mammography screening: average glandular dose and first performance parameters.
Weigel S; Girnus R; Czwoydzinski J; Decker T; Spital S; Heindel W
Rofo; 2007 Sep; 179(9):892-5. PubMed ID: 17705112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
