194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15351455)
1. The human brain processes visual changes that are not cued by attended auditory stimulation.
Astikainen P; Ruusuvirta T; Wikgren J; Korhonen T
Neurosci Lett; 2004 Sep; 368(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 15351455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cortical and subcortical visual event-related potentials to oddball stimuli in rabbits.
Astikainen P; Ruusuvirta T; Korhonen T
Neuroreport; 2000 May; 11(7):1515-7. PubMed ID: 10841368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual mismatch negativity for changes in orientation--a sensory memory-dependent response.
Astikainen P; Lillstrang E; Ruusuvirta T
Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 28(11):2319-24. PubMed ID: 19019200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: an event-related brain potential study.
Salmi J; Rinne T; Degerman A; Alho K
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3725-33. PubMed ID: 17610592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ERPs to pitch changes: a result of reduced responses to standard tones in rabbits.
Ruusuvirta T; Korhonen T; Arikoski J; Kivirikko K
Neuroreport; 1996 Jan; 7(2):413-6. PubMed ID: 8730794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
Beer AL; Röder B
Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Visual analog of mismatch negativity when stimuli differ in the duration].
Khodanovich MIu; Esipenko EA; Svetlik MV; Krutenkova EP
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2009; 59(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 19591396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implicit, intuitive, and explicit knowledge of abstract regularities in a sound sequence: an event-related brain potential study.
van Zuijen TL; Simoens VL; Paavilainen P; Näätänen R; Tervaniemi M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1292-303. PubMed ID: 16859415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter-modal attention: ERPs to auditory targets in an inter-modal oddball task.
Brown CR; Clarke AR; Barry RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 16529831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: a behavioral and event-related potential study.
Boll S; Berti S
Psychophysiology; 2009 May; 46(3):645-54. PubMed ID: 19386054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory processing in an inter-modal oddball task: effects of a combined auditory/visual standard on auditory target ERPs.
Brown CR; Clarke AR; Barry RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 17481761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interactions between attention and perceptual grouping in human visual cortex.
Khoe W; Freeman E; Woldorff MG; Mangun GR
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 16500628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Position but not color deviants result in visual mismatch negativity in an active oddball task.
Berti S
Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(7):702-7. PubMed ID: 19349916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age and novelty: event-related potentials to visual stimuli within an auditory oddball--visual detection task.
Czigler I; Pató L; Poszet E; Balázs L
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):290-9. PubMed ID: 16837090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual temporal window of integration as revealed by the visual mismatch negativity event-related potential to stimulus omissions.
Czigler I; Winkler I; Pató L; Várnagy A; Weisz J; Balázs L
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):129-40. PubMed ID: 16822480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When sound and picture do not fit: Mismatch negativity and sensory interaction.
Ullsperger P; Erdmann U; Freude G; Dehoff W
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 16290115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cerebellar damage impairs detection of somatosensory input changes. A somatosensory mismatch-negativity study.
Restuccia D; Della Marca G; Valeriani M; Leggio MG; Molinari M
Brain; 2007 Jan; 130(Pt 1):276-87. PubMed ID: 16982654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
