These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15351559)

  • 21. A comparison between an in vitro ureteroscopic stone size estimation and the stone size measurement with the help of a scale on stone baskets.
    Cordes J; Teske L; Nguyen F; Pinkowski W; Sievert KD; Vonthein R
    World J Urol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1303-9. PubMed ID: 26847338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Physical characteristics of next-generation ureteral access sheaths: buckling and kinking.
    Pedro RN; Hendlin K; Durfee WK; Monga M
    Urology; 2007 Sep; 70(3):440-2. PubMed ID: 17905092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Critical analysis of the miniaturized stone basket: effect on deflection and flow rate.
    Magheli A; Semins MJ; Allaf ME; Matlaga BR
    J Endourol; 2012 Mar; 26(3):275-7. PubMed ID: 22022885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A novel dual-diameter ureteroscope working channel: impact on irrigant flow.
    Monga M; Hendlin K; Skenazy J; Ramani A
    Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):892-4. PubMed ID: 15533472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a new multi-basket load-release ureteral stent.
    Pierre SA; Bamberger M; Choi B; Albala D
    J Endourol; 2008 Apr; 22(4):831-4. PubMed ID: 18419225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A new spin on the entrapped ureteral calculus.
    Canales BK; Ramani A; Monga M
    J Endourol; 2006 Jul; 20(7):460-1; discussion 462. PubMed ID: 16859454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. "Blind coning"--using the Stone Cone for removal of intramural ureteral calculi.
    Eisner BH; Feldman AS; Chapin BF; Dretler SP
    Urology; 2007 Apr; 69(4):773-5. PubMed ID: 17445670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ten-year experience with looped catheter manipulation of ureteral calculi.
    Tsuang MT; Evans AT
    Urology; 1983 Mar; 21(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 6836798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is there a role for small-diameter ureteral access sheaths? Impact on irrigant flow and intrapelvic pressures.
    Monga M; Bodie J; Ercole B
    Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):439-41; discussion 441-2. PubMed ID: 15351562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preventing retrograde stone displacement during pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral calculi using lidocaine jelly.
    Mohseni MG; Arasteh S; Alizadeh F
    Urology; 2006 Sep; 68(3):505-7. PubMed ID: 17010727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of lighted ureteral catheter luminance for laparoscopy.
    Teichman JM; Lackner JE; Harrison JM
    Tech Urol; 1997; 3(4):213-5. PubMed ID: 9531105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical experience with electromechanical impactor.
    Dretler SP
    J Urol; 1993 Nov; 150(5 Pt 1):1402-4. PubMed ID: 8411409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ureteral calculi: percutaneous removal using modified basket extractors and fluoroscopy.
    Hare WS
    Radiology; 1986 Jul; 160(1):189-92. PubMed ID: 3715031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ureteral expanding stent: a new device for urolithiasis.
    L'Esperance JO; Rickner T; Hoenig D; Bamberger M; Albala DM
    J Endourol; 2007 May; 21(5):533-7. PubMed ID: 17523909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of an antiretropulsion device to prevent stone retropulsion significantly increases the efficiency of pneumatic lithotripsy: an in vitro study.
    Eisner BH; Pengune W; Stoller ML
    BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 19338527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of heads-up display imaging on endoscopic task performance.
    Ryndin I; Lukasewycz S; Hoffman N; Nakib NA; Best S; Monga M
    J Endourol; 2005 Oct; 19(8):964-7. PubMed ID: 16253059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Endoscopic forceps for ureteroscopy: a comparative in vitro analysis.
    Sarkissian C; Marchini GS; Monga M
    Urology; 2013 Mar; 81(3):690-5. PubMed ID: 23352368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of irrigation systems on stone migration.
    Hendlin K; Weiland D; Monga M
    J Endourol; 2008 Mar; 22(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 18355140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    Bechis SK; Abbott JE; Sur RL
    Transl Androl Urol; 2017 Dec; 6(6):1144-1149. PubMed ID: 29354502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro comparison of stone retropulsion and fragmentation of the frequency doubled, double pulse nd:yag laser and the holmium:yag laser.
    Marguet CG; Sung JC; Springhart WP; L'Esperance JO; Zhou S; Zhong P; Albala DM; Preminger GM
    J Urol; 2005 May; 173(5):1797-800. PubMed ID: 15821590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.