331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15351591)
1. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression.
Aydin H; Tsuzuki T; Hernandez D; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 15351591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database.
Buschemeyer WC; Hamilton RJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):124-9; discussion 129. PubMed ID: 17997433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Invasion of seminal vesicles by adenocarcinoma of the prostate: PSA outcome determined by preoperative and postoperative factors.
Bloom KD; Richie JP; Schultz D; Renshaw A; Saegaert T; D'amico AV
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 14972484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression.
Sofer M; Hamilton-Nelson KL; Civantos F; Soloway MS
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2453-6. PubMed ID: 11992056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Han M; Partin AW; Zahurak M; Piantadosi S; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):517-23. PubMed ID: 12544300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative PSA level significantly associated with interval to biochemical progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Gonzalez CM; Roehl KA; Antenor JV; Blunt LW; Han M; Catalona WJ
Urology; 2004 Oct; 64(4):723-8. PubMed ID: 15491709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.
Kamat AM; Babaian K; Cheung MR; Naya Y; Huang SH; Kuban D; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1860-3. PubMed ID: 14532793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Carter HB; Peck HJ; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. PubMed ID: 17698121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.
Boorjian SA; Thompson RH; Siddiqui S; Bagniewski S; Bergstralh EJ; Karnes RJ; Frank I; Blute ML
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):864-70; discussion 870-1. PubMed ID: 17631342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vascular invasion predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy: stratification of risk based on pathologic variables.
Ferrari MK; McNeal JE; Malhotra SM; Brooks JD
Urology; 2004 Oct; 64(4):749-53. PubMed ID: 15491714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence.
Capitanio U; Scattoni V; Freschi M; Briganti A; Salonia A; Gallina A; Colombo R; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2008 Jul; 54(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 18314255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer.
Bhatta-Dhar N; Reuther AM; Zippe C; Klein EA
Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 15028451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Wieder JA; Soloway MS
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):299-315. PubMed ID: 9679867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
