242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15351986)
1. Whole genome amplification for CGH analysis: Linker-adapter PCR as the method of choice for difficult and limited samples.
Pirker C; Raidl M; Steiner E; Elbling L; Holzmann K; Spiegl-Kreinecker S; Aubele M; Grasl-Kraupp B; Marosi C; Micksche M; Berger W
Cytometry A; 2004 Sep; 61(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 15351986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridization.
Kuukasjärvi T; Tanner M; Pennanen S; Karhu R; Visakorpi T; Isola J
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Feb; 18(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 9115969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR-comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA copy number changes in tumors.
Huang Q; Schantz SP; Rao PH; Mo J; McCormick SA; Chaganti RS
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2000 Aug; 28(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 10862048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A simple method for fixation and microdissection of frozen fresh tissue sections for molecular cytogenetic analysis of cancers.
Huang Q; Sacks PG; Mo J; McCormick SA; Iacob CE; Guo L; Schaefer S; Schantz SP
Biotech Histochem; 2005; 80(3-4):147-56. PubMed ID: 16298900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Large fragment Bst DNA polymerase for whole genome amplification of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.
Aviel-Ronen S; Qi Zhu C; Coe BP; Liu N; Watson SK; Lam WL; Tsao MS
BMC Genomics; 2006 Dec; 7():312. PubMed ID: 17156491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Whole genome amplification and molecular genetic analysis of DNA from paraffin-embedded prostate adenocarcinoma tumor tissue.
Kim SH; Godfrey T; Jensen RH
J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1512-8. PubMed ID: 10492247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of whole genome amplification methods for further quantitative analysis with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Lee YS; Tsai CN; Tsai CL; Chang SD; Hsueh DW; Liu CT; Ma CC; Lin SH; Wang TH; Wang HS
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 47(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 18400580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Study on the amplification uniformity of whole genome in a single cell by degenerate oligonucleotide primed polymerase chain reaction].
Jin F; Huang H; Ye Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Aug; 35(8):459-61. PubMed ID: 11776196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic aberrations in prostate carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis: association with progression and angiogenesis.
Strohmeyer DM; Berger AP; Moore DH; Bartsch G; Klocker H; Carroll PR; Loening SA; Jensen RH
Prostate; 2004 Apr; 59(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 14991865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An isothermal method for whole genome amplification of fresh and degraded DNA for comparative genomic hybridization, genotyping and mutation detection.
Lee CI; Leong SH; Png AE; Choo KW; Syn C; Lim DT; Law HY; Kon OL
DNA Res; 2006 Apr; 13(2):77-88. PubMed ID: 16766515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic heterogeneity by comparative genomic hybridization in BRCAx breast cancers.
Mangia A; Chiarappa P; Tommasi S; Chiriatti A; Petroni S; Schittulli F; Paradiso A
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2008 Apr; 182(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 18406868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP-PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones.
Fiegler H; Carr P; Douglas EJ; Burford DC; Hunt S; Scott CE; Smith J; Vetrie D; Gorman P; Tomlinson IP; Carter NP
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Apr; 36(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 12619160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the reliability of chromosomal imbalances detected by combined use of universal DNA amplification and comparative genomic hybridization.
Harada T; Shiraishi K; Kusano N; Umayahara K; Kondoh S; Okita K; Sasaki K
Jpn J Cancer Res; 2000 Nov; 91(11):1119-25. PubMed ID: 11092976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of DOP-PCR for amplification and labeling of BAC DNA for FISH.
Darouich S; Popovici C; Missirian C; Moncla A
Biotech Histochem; 2012 Feb; 87(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 21314248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimized amplification and fluorescent labeling of small cell samples for genomic array-CGH.
Knijnenburg J; van der Burg M; Tanke HJ; Szuhai K
Cytometry A; 2007 Aug; 71(8):585-91. PubMed ID: 17458882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Global search for chromosomal abnormalities in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast using array-comparative genomic hybridization.
Somiari SB; Shriver CD; He J; Parikh K; Jordan R; Hooke J; Hu H; Deyarmin B; Lubert S; Malicki L; Heckman C; Somiari RI
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Dec; 155(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 15571796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization.
Voullaire L; Wilton L; Slater H; Williamson R
Prenat Diagn; 1999 Sep; 19(9):846-51. PubMed ID: 10521843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SCOMP is superior to degenerated oligonucleotide primed-polymerase chain reaction for global amplification of minute amounts of DNA from microdissected archival tissue samples.
Stoecklein NH; Erbersdobler A; Schmidt-Kittler O; Diebold J; Schardt JA; Izbicki JR; Klein CA
Am J Pathol; 2002 Jul; 161(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 12107088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-cell isolation from cell suspensions and whole genome amplification from single cells to provide templates for CGH analysis.
Geigl JB; Speicher MR
Nat Protoc; 2007; 2(12):3173-84. PubMed ID: 18079717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
