141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15352626)
1. [Consequence of intellectual property and consortium project in neurosurgery].
Honmou O; Houkin K
No Shinkei Geka; 2004 Jun; 32(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 15352626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Intellectual property. University licensing and the Bayh-Dole Act.
Thursby JG; Thursby MC
Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5636):1052. PubMed ID: 12933996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Empowering the inventor--the case of monoclonal antibodies.
Clark M
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Sep; 23(9):1047-9. PubMed ID: 16151388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The winding road from ideas to income.
Wadman M
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):830-1. PubMed ID: 18548029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The MTA-rip it up and start again?
Ku K; Henderson J
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 25(7):721-4. PubMed ID: 17621290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Technology: Intellectual property and technology transfer.
Connors HR
J Prof Nurs; 2001; 17(4):155. PubMed ID: 11464333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Science and law. View from the bench: patents and material transfers.
Walsh JP; Cho C; Cohen WM
Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5743):2002-3. PubMed ID: 16179461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Introduction to intellectual property rights for investigators in health research and institutional intellectual property policy.
Shemdoe GS
Acta Trop; 2009 Nov; 112 Suppl 1():S80-3. PubMed ID: 19682967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Need a reagent? Just sign here..
Marshall E
Science; 1997 Oct; 278(5336):212-3. PubMed ID: 9340765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. China steps up US biotech intellectual property land grab.
Ratner M
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):141-2. PubMed ID: 18259157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. ScanBalt coordinates intellectual property in Northern Europe.
Sheridan C
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):355. PubMed ID: 15017988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Technology transfer. Universities find too many strings attached to foundation's offer.
Holden C
Science; 2006 May; 312(5777):1127. PubMed ID: 16728608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A new approach to intellectual property.
Sandhu A
Nat Nanotechnol; 2009 Jan; 4(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 19119269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Material transfer agreements: open science vs. proprietary claims.
Rodriguez V
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Apr; 23(4):489-91. PubMed ID: 15815676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. More than the money.
Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7086):845-6. PubMed ID: 16612340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The intellectual property management for data sharing in a German liver cancer research network.
He S; Ganzinger M; Knaup P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():891-5. PubMed ID: 22874321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Protection of ideas and research results].
Musoles S
Med Clin (Barc); 2012 Dec; 139(15):688-93. PubMed ID: 23103109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayh-Dole: almost 25.
Kennedy D
Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5714):1375. PubMed ID: 15746390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of University Technology Managers Asia 2013 conference.
Komatani TS
Pharm Pat Anal; 2013 Jul; 2(4):447-9. PubMed ID: 24237121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Debates over credit for the annotation of genomes.
Nature; 2000 Jun; 405(6788):719. PubMed ID: 10866159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
