408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15353421)
1. Comparability of skin screening histories obtained by telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires: a randomized crossover study.
Aitken JF; Youl PH; Janda M; Elwood M; Ring IT; Lowe JB
Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 160(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 15353421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of self-reported skin screening histories.
Aitken JF; Youl PH; Janda M; Elwood M; Ring IT; Lowe JB; Firman DW
Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Jun; 159(11):1098-105. PubMed ID: 15155295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What motivates men age > or =50 years to participate in a screening program for melanoma?
Janda M; Youl PH; Lowe JB; Baade PD; Elwood M; Ring IT; Aitken JF
Cancer; 2006 Aug; 107(4):815-23. PubMed ID: 16832794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence of whole-body skin self-examination in a population at high risk for skin cancer (Australia).
Aitken JF; Janda M; Lowe JB; Elwood M; Ring IT; Youl PH; Firman DW
Cancer Causes Control; 2004 Jun; 15(5):453-63. PubMed ID: 15286465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attitudes and intentions in relation to skin checks for early signs of skin cancer.
Janda M; Youl PH; Lowe JB; Elwood M; Ring IT; Aitken JF
Prev Med; 2004 Jul; 39(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 15207981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Telephone vs face-to-face interviews for quantitative food frequency assessment.
Lyu LC; Hankin JH; Liu LQ; Wilkens LR; Lee JH; Goodman MT; Kolonel LN
J Am Diet Assoc; 1998 Jan; 98(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 9434650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Who attends skin cancer clinics within a randomized melanoma screening program?
Youl PH; Janda M; Elwood M; Lowe JB; Ring IT; Aitken JF
Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 16457967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized crossover trial to examine administration techniques related to the Bristol female lower urinary tract symptom (BFLUTS) questionnaire.
Khan MS; Chaliha C; Leskova L; Khullar V
Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 15791603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do centralised skin screening clinics increase participation in melanoma screening (Australia)?
Janda M; Lowe JB; Elwood M; Ring IT; Youl PH; Aitken JF
Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Mar; 17(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 16425094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosis and management costs of suspicious skin lesions from a population-based melanoma screening programme.
Gordon L; Youl PH; Elwood M; Janda M; Ring IT; Lowe JB; Aitken JF
J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 17626710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The skin awareness study: promoting thorough skin self-examination for skin cancer among men 50 years or older.
Janda M; Baade PD; Youl PH; Aitken JF; Whiteman DC; Gordon L; Neale RE
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Jan; 31(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 19900577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Queensland Cancer Risk Study: general population norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G).
Janda M; DiSipio T; Hurst C; Cella D; Newman B
Psychooncology; 2009 Jun; 18(6):606-14. PubMed ID: 18942661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized trial to improve early detection and prevention practices among siblings of melanoma patients.
Geller AC; Emmons KM; Brooks DR; Powers C; Zhang Z; Koh HK; Heeren T; Sober AJ; Li F; Gilchrest BA
Cancer; 2006 Aug; 107(4):806-14. PubMed ID: 16832795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Phenotyping of type 2 diabetes mellitus by "genetic field work": are data sufficient that are based only on a questionnaire?].
Mönks D; Swoboda F; Breunig F; Krane V; Drechsler C; Blum H; Leising D; Wanner C
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2007 Sep; 132(37):1875-9. PubMed ID: 17823877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing participation in cutaneous screening among individuals with a family history of melanoma.
Azzarello LM; Jacobsen PB
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Mar; 56(3):398-406. PubMed ID: 17184873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women.
Armstrong K; Long JA; Shea JA
Prev Med; 2004 Jun; 38(6):754-60. PubMed ID: 15193895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors related to the presentation of thin and thick nodular melanoma from a population-based cancer registry in Queensland Australia.
Geller AC; Elwood M; Swetter SM; Brooks DR; Aitken J; Youl PH; Demierre MF; Baade PD
Cancer; 2009 Mar; 115(6):1318-27. PubMed ID: 19189368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chapter II. Differences between the telephone and personal interview data.
Groves RM; Miller PV; Cannell CF
Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):11-9. PubMed ID: 15791751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk group, skin lesion history, and sun sensitivity reliability in squamous cell skin cancer progression.
Clouser MC; Harris RB; Roe DJ; Saboda K; Ranger-Moore J; Duckett L; Alberts DS
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Nov; 15(11):2292-7. PubMed ID: 17119060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer interview for screening blood donors for risk of HIV transmission.
Locke SE; Kowaloff HB; Hoff RG; Safran C; Popovsky MA; Cotton DJ; Finkelstein DM; Page PL; Slack WV
MD Comput; 1994; 11(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 8145632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
