These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A comparison of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography screening strategies in the detection and recovery of subcentimeter adenomas. Benson M; Dureja P; Gopal D; Reichelderfer M; Pfau PR Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Dec; 105(12):2578-85. PubMed ID: 20842111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. Pickhardt PJ; Choi JR; Hwang I; Butler JA; Puckett ML; Hildebrandt HA; Wong RK; Nugent PA; Mysliwiec PA; Schindler WR N Engl J Med; 2003 Dec; 349(23):2191-200. PubMed ID: 14657426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography for detection of adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults: a prospective evaluation. Zalis ME; Blake MA; Cai W; Hahn PF; Halpern EF; Kazam IG; Keroack M; Magee C; Näppi JJ; Perez-Johnston R; Saltzman JR; Vij A; Yee J; Yoshida H Ann Intern Med; 2012 May; 156(10):692-702. PubMed ID: 22586008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual colonoscopy, optical colonoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial. You JJ; Liu Y; Kirby J; Vora P; Moayyedi P Trials; 2015 Jul; 16():296. PubMed ID: 26156248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates. Chung SJ; Kim D; Song JH; Park MJ; Kim YS; Kim JS; Jung HC; Song IS Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 20493487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colorectal Polyps Missed with Optical Colonoscopy Despite Previous Detection and Localization with CT Colonography. Pooler BD; Kim DH; Weiss JM; Matkowskyj KA; Pickhardt PJ Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 26280354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Summaries for patients. How often does colonoscopy fail to detect polyps? Ann Intern Med; 2004 Sep; 141(5):I42. PubMed ID: 15353443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [A prospective comparison of video colonoscopy and CT colonography in asymptomatic patients screened for colorectal cancer]. Juchems M; Römpp A; Kestler HA; Ernst A; Brambs HJ; Adler G; Aschoff A; Wagner M Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Aug; 135(34-35):1656-61. PubMed ID: 20721840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Findings on optical colonoscopy after positive CT colonography exam. Cornett D; Barancin C; Roeder B; Reichelderfer M; Frick T; Gopal D; Kim D; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor A; Pfau P Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 103(8):2068-74. PubMed ID: 18564114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Graser A; Stieber P; Nagel D; Schäfer C; Horst D; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Lottes A; Geisbüsch S; Kramer H; Wagner AC; Diepolder H; Schirra J; Roth HJ; Seidel D; Göke B; Reiser MF; Kolligs FT Gut; 2009 Feb; 58(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 18852257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Heresbach D; Barrioz T; Lapalus MG; Coumaros D; Bauret P; Potier P; Sautereau D; Boustière C; Grimaud JC; Barthélémy C; Sée J; Serraj I; D'Halluin PN; Branger B; Ponchon T Endoscopy; 2008 Apr; 40(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 18389446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Missed adenomas with behind-folds visualizing colonoscopy technologies compared with standard colonoscopy: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized back-to-back tandem colonoscopy studies. Brand EC; Dik VK; van Oijen MGH; Siersema PD Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Aug; 86(2):376-385.e2. PubMed ID: 28069476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study. Leufkens AM; van Oijen MG; Vleggaar FP; Siersema PD Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22441756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center. Buchner AM; Guarner-Argente C; Ginsberg GG Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 22657404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Summers RM; Yao J; Pickhardt PJ; Franaszek M; Bitter I; Brickman D; Krishna V; Choi JR Gastroenterology; 2005 Dec; 129(6):1832-44. PubMed ID: 16344052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. Pasha SF; Leighton JA; Das A; Harrison ME; Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Fleischer DE; Sharma VK Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 107(3):363-70; quiz 371. PubMed ID: 22186978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO Anderson JC; Kahi CJ; Sullivan A; MacPhail M; Garcia J; Rex DK Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):591-598. PubMed ID: 30367879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. Graser A; Melzer A; Lindner E; Nagel D; Herrmann K; Stieber P; Schirra J; Mansmann U; Reiser MF; Göke B; Kolligs FT Gastroenterology; 2013 Apr; 144(4):743-750.e2. PubMed ID: 23415805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of virtual colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy in detection of colorectal polyps. Selçuk D; Demirel K; Ozer H; Baca B; Hatemi I; Mihmanli I; Korman U; Oğüt G Turk J Gastroenterol; 2006 Dec; 17(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 17205408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]