350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15354108)
1. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves.
Bottio T; Caprili L; Casarotto D; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Sep; 128(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 15354108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-vitro testing of three totally supra-annular bileaflet mechanical valves: hydrodynamics in the Sheffield pulse duplicator.
Bottio T; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Mar; 17(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 18512495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of different mechanical prostheses suitable for replacement of the systemic atrioventricular valve in children.
Bottio T; Dal Lin C; Lika A; Rizzoli G; Tarzia V; Buratto E; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 143(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 21890150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards-Duromedics, and Sorin-Bicarbon valves.
Reul H; van Son JA; Steinseifer U; Schmitz B; Schmidt A; Schmitz C; Rau G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Sep; 106(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 8361181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the new mechanical bileaflet Sorin Bicarbon valve prosthesis compared with St. Jude Medical].
Badano L; Carratino L; De Gaetano G; Piazza R; Calisi P; Passerone G; Lucatti A
G Ital Cardiol; 1994 Jun; 24(6):733-43. PubMed ID: 8088472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The new St. Jude Medical regent mechanical heart valve: laboratory measurements of hydrodynamic performance.
Walker DK; Brendzel AM; Scotten LN
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):687-96. PubMed ID: 10616249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of small-size Sorin Slimline and St. Jude HP heart valve prostheses.
Otero E; Pomar JL; Revuelta JM; Rufilanchas JJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Apr; 79(4):1284-90. PubMed ID: 15797063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamics of high-performance bileaflet valves: comparison to simulated clinical Doppler measurements.
Dohmen G; Schmitz C; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Autschbach R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 16901053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Valve replacement with bileaflet HP-Biplus mechanical prostheses versus standard prostheses: long-term results.
Cianciulli TF; Lax JA; Beck MA; Guidoin R; Saccheri MC; Cosarinsky LA; Gadea FJ; Dorelle AN; Prezioso HA; Vidal LA
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Mar; 17(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 18512493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The changing spectrum of bioprostheses hydrodynamic performance: considerations on in-vitro tests.
Bottio T; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 Oct; 7(5):750-4. PubMed ID: 18628343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the hemodynamic and thrombogenic performance of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves using a CFD/FSI model.
Dumont K; Vierendeels J; Kaminsky R; van Nooten G; Verdonck P; Bluestein D
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Aug; 129(4):558-65. PubMed ID: 17655477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Doppler assessment of mechanical aortic valve prostheses: effect of valve design and size of the aorta.
Mascherbauer J; Schima H; Maurer G; Baumgartner H
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 15473486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Serial Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of small-sized sorin bicarbon prostheses.
De Carlo M; Milano AD; Nardi C; Mecozzi G; Bortolotti U
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Aug; 126(2):337-43. PubMed ID: 12928629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemolysis parameters of St. Jude Medical: Hemodynamic Plus and Regent valves in aortic position.
Suedkamp M; Lercher AJ; Mueller-Riemenschneider F; LaRosee K; Tossios P; Mehlhorn U
Int J Cardiol; 2004 May; 95(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 15159044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of aortic heart valve prostheses. Part 1: Mechanical valves.
Knott E; Reul H; Knoch M; Steinseifer U; Rau G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Dec; 96(6):952-61. PubMed ID: 3193804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A single-center experience of the Sorin Bicarbon heart valve prosthesis: long-term clinical, hematological and hemodynamic results.
Whitaker DC; James SE; Walesby RK
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Jan; 13(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 14765847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hemodynamic performance of the 21-mm Sorin Bicarbon mechanical aortic prostheses using dobutamine Doppler echocardiography.
Kadir I; Wan IY; Walsh C; Wilde P; Bryan AJ; Angelini GD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Jul; 72(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11465229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of aortic valve prosthesis in a novel valved conduit with pseudosinuses of Valsalva.
De Paulis R; Schmitz C; Scaffa R; Nardi P; Chiariello L; Reul H
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 130(4):1016-21. PubMed ID: 16214513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
