These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1535453)

  • 1. Determination of the carboxyl content in humic substances by methylation.
    Arsenie I; Boren H; Allard B
    Sci Total Environ; 1992 May; 116(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 1535453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Charge characteristics of humic and fulvic acids: comparative analysis by colloid titration and potentiometric titration with continuous pK-distribution function model.
    Bratskaya S; Golikov A; Lutsenko T; Nesterova O; Dudarchik V
    Chemosphere; 2008 Sep; 73(4):557-63. PubMed ID: 18657293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acid-base properties of humic and fulvic acids formed during composting.
    Plaza C; Senesi N; Polo A; Brunetti G
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Sep; 39(18):7141-6. PubMed ID: 16201640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of the adsorption of humic acid, fulvic acid and phenol onto Bacillus subtilis and activated sludge.
    Moura MN; Martín MJ; Burguillo FJ
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Oct; 149(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17475400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relating ion binding by fulvic and humic acids to chemical composition and molecular size. 1. Proton binding.
    Christl I; Kretzschmar R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Jun; 35(12):2505-11. PubMed ID: 11432555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Humic substances as catalysts in condensation reactions.
    Kļaviņs M; Dipane J; Babre K
    Chemosphere; 2001 Aug; 44(4):737-42. PubMed ID: 11482663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relating ion binding by fulvic and humic acids to chemical composition and molecular size. 2. Metal binding.
    Christl I; Milne CJ; Kinniburgh DG; Kretzschmar R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Jun; 35(12):2512-7. PubMed ID: 11432556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generic NICA-Donnan model parameters for proton binding by humic substances.
    Milne CJ; Kinniburgh DG; Tipping E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 May; 35(10):2049-59. PubMed ID: 11393987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic light scattering measurements of particle size development in aqueous humic materials.
    Palmer NE; von Wandruszka R
    Fresenius J Anal Chem; 2001 Dec; 371(7):951-4. PubMed ID: 11769806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spectroscopic and potentiometric studies on derivatized natural humic acid.
    Andjelkovic T; Perovic J; Purenovic M; Blagojevic S; Nikolic R; Andjelkovic D; Bojic A
    Anal Sci; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1553-8. PubMed ID: 17159314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distribution of proton dissociation constants for model humic and fulvic acid molecules.
    Atalay YB; Carbonaro RF; Di Toro DM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 May; 43(10):3626-31. PubMed ID: 19544864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Removal of organic polyelectrolytes and their metal complexes by adsorption onto xonotlite.
    Katsumata H; Kaneco S; Matsuno R; Itoh K; Masuyama K; Suzuki T; Funasaka K; Ohta K
    Chemosphere; 2003 Aug; 52(5):909-15. PubMed ID: 12757792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of pH and ionic strength on the binding of paraquat and MCPA by soil fulvic and humic acids.
    Iglesias A; López R; Gondar D; Antelo J; Fiol S; Arce F
    Chemosphere; 2009 Jun; 76(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 19269671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Characterization of isolated fractions of NOM from Songhua River].
    Guo J; Ma J
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2005 Sep; 26(5):77-84. PubMed ID: 16366474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generic NICA-Donnan model parameters for metal-ion binding by humic substances.
    Milne CJ; Kinniburgh DG; van Riemsdijk WH; Tipping E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Mar; 37(5):958-71. PubMed ID: 12666927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sorption of humic substances on aquifer material at artificial recharge of groundwater.
    Juhna T; Klavins M; Eglite L
    Chemosphere; 2003 Jun; 51(9):861-8. PubMed ID: 12697176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fulvic acids as transition state of organic matter: indications from high resolution mass spectrometry.
    Reemtsma T; These A; Springer A; Linscheid M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Oct; 40(19):5839-45. PubMed ID: 17051768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of the phenolic-group capacities of humic substances by non-aqueous titration technique.
    Kirishima A; Ohnishi T; Sato N; Tochiyama O
    Talanta; 2009 Jul; 79(2):446-53. PubMed ID: 19559903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Silver(I) Binding Properties of Organic Soil Materials Are Different from Those of Isolated Humic Substances.
    B Kleja D; Nakata S; Persson I; Gustafsson JP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(14):7453-60. PubMed ID: 27305455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Character of Humic Substances as a Predictor for Goethite Nanoparticle Reactivity and Aggregation.
    Vindedahl AM; Stemig MS; Arnold WA; Penn RL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(3):1200-8. PubMed ID: 26790005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.