516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15354659)
1. Indications and techniques for surgical indexing at stage I implant surgery.
Montrose J
Dent Today; 2004 Jul; 23(7):106-9; quiz 109. PubMed ID: 15354659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
van der Zel JM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stabilized record base for implant treatment.
Nimmo SS; Nimmo A
J Prosthodont; 2010 Oct; 19(7):586-8. PubMed ID: 20723017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of a thermoplastic vacuum-formed matrix for secure engagement of an implant surgical template.
Oh WS; Saglik B
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):326-7. PubMed ID: 18922264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The "first implant": protocol for the GP, Part 3.
Tischler M; Ganz SD
Dent Today; 2011 Dec; 30(12):64, 66, 68-9. PubMed ID: 22324106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flapless implant placement: a technique to eliminate the need for a removable interim prosthesis.
Papaspyridakos P; Lal K
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 18762035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Customized abutments to shape and transfer peri-implant soft-tissue contours.
Stumpel LJ; Haechler W; Bedrossian E
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Apr; 28(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 11323930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant-borne single tooth replacement--an illustration and rationale.
Rounsavelle RK
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2001 Nov; 29(11):772-7. PubMed ID: 11806056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wax teeth and metallic superstructure trials at the same session: simplified technique for implant-supported prosthesis.
Margonar R; de Almeida EO; Queiroz TP; Marcantonio E
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1960-2. PubMed ID: 21119469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A technique for fabricating a 2-part surgical template.
Aljadi M; Thompson GA; Izumi M; Ziebert GJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 21723994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A modified occlusal registration and implant transfer technique.
Kaufman M; Cranin AN; Sayed A; Ley J; DeGrado J; Banton B
J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(3-4):258-62. PubMed ID: 9524504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modified technique for stage 1 indexing using the XiVE system.
Neugebauer J
Dent Implantol Update; 2003 Oct; 14(10):73-9. PubMed ID: 14692168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A technique for managing and accurate registration of periimplant soft tissues.
Ntounis A; Petropoulou A
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Oct; 104(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 20875533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-stage approach to aesthetic implant restoration: emergence profile concept.
Davarpanah M; Martinez H; Celletti R; Tecucianu JF
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001; 13(9):761-7; quiz 768, 721-2. PubMed ID: 11862927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perspectives. The ultimate end-results of implant dentistry as it is being practiced today.
Ganz SD; Kradt RA
Implant Dent; 2003; 12(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 14560477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Stage I surgical indexing: clinical and laboratory procedures.
Drago C
J Dent Technol; 2000 Apr; 17(3):16-21. PubMed ID: 11324070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Planning implants crown down--a systematic quality control for proof of concept.
Ewers R; Seemann R; Krennmair G; Schicho K; Kurdi AO; Kirsch A; Reichwein A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 68(11):2868-78. PubMed ID: 20971374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advanced restorative techniques.
Howe L; Palmer P; Barrett V
Br Dent J; 1999 Dec; 187(11):593-600. PubMed ID: 16163276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
Abrams SH
Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
