These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15354684)

  • 1. Coh-metrix: analysis of text on cohesion and language.
    Graesser AC; McNamara DS; Louwerse MM; Cai Z
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 May; 36(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 15354684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension.
    Graesser AC; McNamara DS
    Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Apr; 3(2):371-98. PubMed ID: 25164300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using temporal cohesion to predict temporal coherence in narrative and expository texts.
    Duran ND; McCarthy PM; Graesser AC; McNamara DS
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 May; 39(2):212-23. PubMed ID: 17695347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning, thinking, and emoting with discourse technologies.
    Graesser AC
    Am Psychol; 2011 Nov; 66(8):746-57. PubMed ID: 22082403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Role of Surface, Semantic and Grammatical Features on Simplification of Spanish Medical Texts: A User Study.
    Mukherjee P; Leroy G; Kauchak D; Navarrete BA; Diaz DY; Colina S
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():1322-1331. PubMed ID: 29854201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A theoretically motivated method for automatically evaluating texts for gist inferences.
    Wolfe CR; Dandignac M; Reyna VF
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2419-2437. PubMed ID: 31342470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Cohesion 2.0: Integrating semantic similarity and text overlap.
    Crossley SA; Kyle K; Dascalu M
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):14-27. PubMed ID: 30298264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic modeling of discourse-aware sentence processing.
    Dubey A; Keller F; Sturt P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jul; 5(3):425-51. PubMed ID: 23616488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining the language demands of informed consent documents in patient recruitment to cancer trials using tools from corpus and computational linguistics.
    Isaacs T; Murdoch J; Demjén Z; Stevenson F
    Health (London); 2022 Jul; 26(4):431-456. PubMed ID: 33045861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of differences in text segmentation on the automated quantitative evaluation of song-lyrics.
    Tegge F; Parry K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241979. PubMed ID: 33166329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CRIE: An automated analyzer for Chinese texts.
    Sung YT; Chang TH; Lin WC; Hsieh KS; Chang KE
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1238-1251. PubMed ID: 26424442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Appropriateness of Language Found in Research Consent Form Templates: A Computational Linguistic Analysis.
    Villafranca A; Kereliuk S; Hamlin C; Johnson A; Jacobsohn E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0169143. PubMed ID: 28146568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A large-scaled corpus for assessing text readability.
    Crossley S; Heintz A; Choi JS; Batchelor J; Karimi M; Malatinszky A
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):491-507. PubMed ID: 35297016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Constructing and validating readability models: the method of integrating multilevel linguistic features with machine learning.
    Sung YT; Chen JL; Cha JH; Tseng HC; Chang TH; Chang KE
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):340-54. PubMed ID: 24687843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gist Inference Scores Predict Cloze Comprehension "In Your Own Words" for Native, Not ESL Readers.
    Wolfe CR; Dandignac M; Wang C; Lowe SR
    Health Commun; 2022 Dec; 37(14):1757-1764. PubMed ID: 33947301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond subjective judgments: Predicting evaluations of creative writing from computational linguistic features.
    Zedelius CM; Mills C; Schooler JW
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):879-894. PubMed ID: 30264366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension.
    Fajardo I; Ávila V; Ferrer A; Tavares G; Gómez M; Hernández A
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2014 May; 27(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 23813583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sentence and text comprehension: roles of linguistic structure.
    Clifton C; Duffy SA
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2001; 52():167-96. PubMed ID: 11148303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A text comprehension approach to questionnaire readability: An example using gambling disorder measures.
    Peter SC; Whelan JP; Pfund RA; Meyers AW
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1567-1580. PubMed ID: 29902047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
    Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.