137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15354697)
1. Reform of statistical inference in psychology: the case of memory & cognition.
Finch S; Cumming G; Williams J; Palmer L; Griffith E; Alders C; Anderson J; Goodman O
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 May; 36(2):312-24. PubMed ID: 15354697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Buy three but get only two: the smallest effect in a 2 × 2 ANOVA is always uninterpretable.
Garcia-Marques L; Garcia-Marques T; Brauer M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1415-30. PubMed ID: 24841234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy.
Nickerson RS
Psychol Methods; 2000 Jun; 5(2):241-301. PubMed ID: 10937333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Confidence intervals permit, but do not guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testing.
Coulson M; Healey M; Fidler F; Cumming G
Front Psychol; 2010; 1():26. PubMed ID: 21607077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond inference by eye: Statistical and graphing practices in JEAB, 1992-2017.
Kyonka EGE; Mitchell SH; Bizo LA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Mar; 111(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 30747443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: a quiet methodological revolution.
Rodgers JL
Am Psychol; 2010 Jan; 65(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20063905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Search for Significance: A Few Peculiarities in the Distribution of P Values in Experimental Psychology Literature.
Krawczyk M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127872. PubMed ID: 26061881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the interpretation of removable interactions: a survey of the field 33 years after Loftus.
Wagenmakers EJ; Krypotos AM; Criss AH; Iverson G
Mem Cognit; 2012 Feb; 40(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 22069144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A review and correction of the errors in Loftus and Guyer on Jane Doe.
Olafson E
J Interpers Violence; 2014 Dec; 29(18):3245-59. PubMed ID: 24913759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning-forgetting independence, unidimensional memory models, and feature models: comment on Bogartz (1990).
Loftus GR; Bamber D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Sep; 16(5):916-26. PubMed ID: 2147446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Swan Song Editorial.
Lindsay DS
Psychol Sci; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1669-1673. PubMed ID: 31794295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical reform in psychology: is anything changing?
Cumming G; Fidler F; Leonard M; Kalinowski P; Christiansen A; Kleinig A; Lo J; McMenamin N; Wilson S
Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):230-2. PubMed ID: 17444919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013).
Nuijten MB; Hartgerink CH; van Assen MA; Epskamp S; Wicherts JM
Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1205-1226. PubMed ID: 26497820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward improved statistical reporting in the journal of consulting and clinical psychology.
Fidler F; Cumming G; Thomason N; Pannuzzo D; Smith J; Fyffe P; Edmonds H; Harrington C; Schmitt R
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Feb; 73(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 15709840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inaugural editorial.
Gauthier I
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):1. PubMed ID: 29309191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Error Rates, Decisive Outcomes and Publication Bias with Several Inferential Methods.
Hopkins WG; Batterham AM
Sports Med; 2016 Oct; 46(10):1563-73. PubMed ID: 26971328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The statistical reporting quality of articles published in 2010 in five dental journals.
Vähänikkilä H; Tjäderhane L; Nieminen P
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Jan; 73(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 25373621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A model-averaging approach to replication: the case of p rep.
Iverson GJ; Wagenmakers EJ; Lee MD
Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 20515238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Too good to be true: publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology.
Francis G
Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 22351589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
