129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15354901)
1. The impact of post space preparation with Gates-Glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars.
Kuttler S; McLean A; Dorn S; Fischzang A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 135(7):903-9. PubMed ID: 15354901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The risk of furcal perforation in mandibular molars using Gates-Glidden drills with anticurvature pressure.
Wu MK; van der Sluis LW; Wesselink PR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):378-82. PubMed ID: 15716849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Residual dentin thickness in mesial roots of mandibular molars prepared with Lightspeed rotary instruments and Gates-Glidden reamers.
Zuckerman O; Katz A; Pilo R; Tamse A; Fuss Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Sep; 96(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 12973293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills.
Pilo R; Tamse A
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):617-23. PubMed ID: 10842127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Gates-Glidden, LA Axxess and orifice shaper burs on the cervical dentin thickness and root canal area of mandibular molars.
Duarte MA; Bernardes RA; Ordinola-Zapata R; Vasconcelos BC; Bramante CM; Moraes IG
Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 21519644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative assessment of the effects of Gates-Glidden, Largo, LA-Axxess, and New Brazilian Drill CPdrill on coronal pre-enlargement: cone-beam computed tomographic analysis.
Flores CB; Montagner F; Gomes BP; Dotto GN; da Silva Schmitz M
J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):571-4. PubMed ID: 24666914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the risk of a stripping perforation with Gates-Glidden drills: serial versus crown-down sequences.
Coutinho-Filho T; De-Deus G; Gurgel-Filho ED; Rocha-Lima AC; Dias KR; Barbosa CA
Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 18425240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microcomputer tomography measurement of minimum residual dentin thickness in mandibular first molars after virtual fiber post placement.
Chen X; Min Y; Gao Y; Peng L
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):506-513. PubMed ID: 31227234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of ProTaper Universal, Endoflare, Revo-S, HyFlex coronal flaring instruments, and Gates Glidden drills on crack formation.
Arslan H; Karataş E; Capar ID; Ozsu D; Doğanay E
J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1681-3. PubMed ID: 25127932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Residual dentin thickness in bifurcated maxillary first premolars after root canal and post space preparation with parallel-sided drills.
Pilo R; Shapenco E; Lewinstein I
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18395536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Periapical radiographs overestimate root canal wall thickness during post space preparation.
Souza EM; Bretas RT; Cenci MS; Maia-Filho EM; Bonetti-Filho I
Int Endod J; 2008 Aug; 41(8):658-63. PubMed ID: 18479369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the effects of TripleGates and Gates-Glidden burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal area by using cone beam computed tomography.
Sousa K; Andrade-Junior CV; Silva JM; Duarte MA; De-Deus G; Silva EJ
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 26018308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of post preparation on the residual dentin thickness of maxillary molars.
Souza EM; do Nascimento LM; Maia Filho EM; Alves CM
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Sep; 106(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 21889005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography.
Mahran AH; AboEl-Fotouh MM
J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1219-22. PubMed ID: 18793924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with hand and rotatory instruments.
Pilo R; Corcino G; Tamse A
J Endod; 1998 Jun; 24(6):401-4. PubMed ID: 9693582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parallel post-space preparation in different tooth types ex vivo: deviation from the canal centre and remaining dentine thickness.
Huysmans MC; Klein MH; Kok GF; Whitworth JM
Int Endod J; 2007 Oct; 40(10):778-85. PubMed ID: 17697109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perforation risks associated with the use of Masserann endodontic kit drills in mandibular molars.
Yoldas O; Oztunc H; Tinaz C; Alparslan N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Apr; 97(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 15088037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.
Akhlaghi NM; Kahali R; Abtahi A; Tabatabaee S; Mehrvarzfar P; Parirokh M
Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 20636352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of post length and diameter on remaining dentine thickness in maxillary central and lateral incisors.
Alomari QD; Barrieshi KM; Al-Awadhi SA
Int Endod J; 2011 Oct; 44(10):956-66. PubMed ID: 21752033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of dentine removal using safety or conventional Hedstrom files.
Lumley PJ
Endod Dent Traumatol; 1997 Apr; 13(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9550032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
