These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15354901)

  • 21. Efficacy of 3 techniques in removing root canal filling material.
    Bodrumlu E; Uzun O; Topuz O; Semiz M
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Oct; 74(8):721. PubMed ID: 18845062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preparation of space for posting: effect on thickness of canal walls and incidence of perforation in molars.
    Abou-Rass M; Jann JM; Jobe D; Tsutsui F
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1982 Jun; 104(6):834-7. PubMed ID: 7047613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. CBCT Assessment of Root Dentine Removal by Gates-Glidden Drills and Two Engine-Driven Root Preparation Systems.
    Harandi A; Mohammadpour Maleki F; Moudi E; Ehsani M; Khafri S
    Iran Endod J; 2017; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 28179920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of root thickness in curved canals after flaring.
    Isom TL; Marshall JG; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1995 Jul; 21(7):368-71. PubMed ID: 7499977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of the size of the apical enlargement with rotary instruments, single-cone filling, post space preparation with drills, fiber post removal, and root canal filling removal on apical crack initiation and propagation.
    Çapar İD; Uysal B; Ok E; Arslan H
    J Endod; 2015 Feb; 41(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 25433969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study.
    Akhlaghi NM; Bajgiran LM; Naghdi A; Behrooz E; Khalilak Z
    Eur J Dent; 2015; 9(2):228-233. PubMed ID: 26038655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Separation anxiety: Gates-Glidden drills can be hazardous to your health.
    Lee RS; Alapati S; Johnson BR
    J Endod; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1470-2. PubMed ID: 21924205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cervical shaping in curved root canals: comparison of the efficiency of two endodontic instruments.
    Busquim SS; dos Santos M
    Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2002; 16(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 12612771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of Reciproc endodontic treatment with three different post space preparation instruments on fiber post retention.
    Tsintsadze N; Garcia M; Grandini S; Goracci C; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2015 Oct; 28(5):251-4. PubMed ID: 26714341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of four instruments on coronal pre-enlargement by using cone beam computed tomography.
    Sanfelice CM; da Costa FB; Reis Só MV; Vier-Pelisser F; Souza Bier CA; Grecca FS
    J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):858-61. PubMed ID: 20416433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Thickness of dentine in mesial roots of mandibular molars with different lengths.
    Sauáia TS; Gomes BP; Pinheiro ET; Zaia AA; Ferraz CC; Souza-Filho FJ; Valdrighi L
    Int Endod J; 2010 Jul; 43(7):555-9. PubMed ID: 20636516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of spreader penetration depth and load required during lateral condensation in teeth prepared using various root canal preparation techniques.
    Dulaimi SF; Wali Al-Hashimi MK
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):510-5. PubMed ID: 16011768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Correlation of root dentin thickness and length of roots in mesial roots of mandibular molars.
    Dwivedi S; Dwivedi CD; Mittal N
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1435-8. PubMed ID: 25146027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Canal Transportation, Unprepared Areas, and Dentin Removal after Preparation with BT-RaCe and ProTaper Next Systems.
    Brasil SC; Marceliano-Alves MF; Marques ML; Grillo JP; Lacerda MFLS; Alves FRF; Siqueira JF; Provenzano JC
    J Endod; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1683-1687. PubMed ID: 28712638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Remaining dentinal thickness after simulated post space preparation and the fit of prefabricated posts to root canal preparation shapes.
    Ha WN; Chaves GS; Decurcio D; Estrela C; Peters OA; Rossi-Fedele G
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2021 Dec; 152(12):1020-1032.e12. PubMed ID: 34656294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Residual dentin thickness of bifurcated maxillary premolars following two post space preparation methods.
    Ghoddusi J; Bagherpour A; Mahmudabadi F; Forghani M; Sarmad M
    Iran Endod J; 2013; 8(3):94-8. PubMed ID: 23922568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The ability of optical coherence tomography to characterize the root canal walls.
    Shemesh H; van Soest G; Wu MK; van der Sluis LW; Wesselink PR
    J Endod; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1369-73. PubMed ID: 17963966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of dowel space on the bond strengths of fiber posts.
    Perdigão J; Gomes G; Augusto V
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(3):154-64. PubMed ID: 17581176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Residual dentin thickness in first premolars after root canal preparation].
    Zhang L; Ji P; Fu X; Song X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 29(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 21932653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Resin cement thickness in oval-shaped canals: oval vs. circular fiber posts in combination with different tips/drills for post space preparation.
    Coniglio I; Garcia-Godoy F; Magni E; Carvalho CA; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2009 Oct; 22(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 20225472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.