BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15355142)

  • 21. Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance.
    Harrison BJ; Shaw M; Yücel M; Purcell R; Brewer WJ; Strother SC; Egan GF; Olver JS; Nathan PJ; Pantelis C
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 15588609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects.
    Wühr P; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 18248132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Coloring single stroop elements: reducing automaticity or slowing color processing?
    Monahan JS
    J Gen Psychol; 2001 Jan; 128(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 11277451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interference and negative priming effects in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Pritchard VE; Neumann E; Rucklidge JJ
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(1):91-122. PubMed ID: 17450641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of the Hayling task to measure inhibition of prepotent responses in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease.
    Belleville S; Rouleau N; Van der Linden M
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 16757076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reverse stroop effects with untranslated responses.
    Blais C; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1345-53. PubMed ID: 17154776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Executive and motivational inhibition: associations with self-report measures related to inhibition.
    Shuster J; Toplak ME
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 19233688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stroop performance in depressive patients: a preliminary report.
    Markela-Lerenc J; Kaiser S; Fiedler P; Weisbrod M; Mundt C
    J Affect Disord; 2006 Aug; 94(1-3):261-7. PubMed ID: 16764940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Generalizability of carry-over effects in the emotional Stroop task.
    Waters AJ; Sayette MA; Franken IH; Schwartz JE
    Behav Res Ther; 2005 Jun; 43(6):715-32. PubMed ID: 15890165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attachment and selective attention: disorganization and emotional Stroop reaction time.
    Atkinson L; Leung E; Goldberg S; Benoit D; Poulton L; Myhal N; Blokland K; Kerr S
    Dev Psychopathol; 2009; 21(1):99-126. PubMed ID: 19144225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of color word availability on the Stroop color-naming effect.
    Kim H; Cho YS; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1540-51. PubMed ID: 19064496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stroop effects in persons with traumatic brain injury: selective attention, speed of processing, or color-naming? A meta-analysis.
    Ben-David BM; Nguyen LL; van Lieshout PH
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2011 Mar; 17(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 21320377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Emotional dilution of the Stroop effect: a new tool for assessing attention under emotion.
    Chajut E; Schupak A; Algom D
    Emotion; 2010 Dec; 10(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 21058847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Further evidence for cognitive inertia of persons with mental retardation.
    Ellis NR; Dulaney CL
    Am J Ment Retard; 1991 May; 95(6):613-21. PubMed ID: 2059413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stroop color-word task as a measure of selective attention: efficiency in closed-head-injured patients.
    Vakil E; Weisz H; Jedwab L; Groswasser Z; Aberbuch S
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 May; 17(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 7650097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of selective attention and facial processing biases in typically developing children who are high and low in self-reported trait anxiety.
    Richards A; French CC; Nash G; Hadwin JA; Donnelly N
    Dev Psychopathol; 2007; 19(2):481-95. PubMed ID: 17459180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evidencing inhibitory deficits in Alzheimer's disease through interference effects and shifting disabilities in the Stroop test.
    Amieva H; Lafont S; Rouch-Leroyer I; Rainville C; Dartigues JF; Orgogozo JM; Fabrigoule C
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Sep; 19(6):791-803. PubMed ID: 15288332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Task dependence in color-naming latency among dieters.
    Huon GF; Brown LB
    Int J Eat Disord; 1996 May; 19(4):405-10. PubMed ID: 8859399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stroop effects from 3 to 10 years: the critical role of reading acquisition.
    Peru A; Faccioli C; Tassinari G
    Arch Ital Biol; 2006 Feb; 144(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 16425617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attention and attentional shift efficiency in individuals with and without mental retardation.
    Bergen AM; Mosley JL
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 May; 98(6):732-43. PubMed ID: 8054202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.